Skip to comments.
Will someone step up to buy the Boston Globe?
Boston Herald ^
 | Thursday, November 20, 2008
 | Christine McConville
Posted on 11/20/2008 3:53:14 PM PST by Lovebloggers
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-33 next  last
    
To: Lovebloggers
2
posted on 
11/20/2008 3:53:46 PM PST
by 
skeeter
(Its Barry's fault)
 
To: Lovebloggers
    Why?
You have the NY Times going under and now the Globe ...
Do I hear “bailout” somewhere ?????
 
3
posted on 
11/20/2008 3:55:10 PM PST
by 
SkyDancer
("Talent Without Ambition Is Sad, Ambition Without Talent Is Worse")
 
To: Lovebloggers
    Maybe the Chinese will buy up all of our distressed assets. Same politics as the Times.
 
4
posted on 
11/20/2008 3:56:15 PM PST
by 
gotribe
(obama just sucks - your wealth away)
 
To: Lovebloggers
5
posted on 
11/20/2008 3:57:06 PM PST
by 
snowrip
(Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
 
To: Lovebloggers
    Let the New York Times go the way of TV Guide...bankruptcy would be good for old Pinch Schulzberger and company.
 
To: Lovebloggers
    I think Rush Limbaugh should buy it...and then use it’s facilities for his Museum for Excellence in Broadcasting.
 
7
posted on 
11/20/2008 3:58:08 PM PST
by 
big'ol_freeper
(Gen. George S. Patton to Michael Moore... American Carol: "I really like slapping you.")
 
To: Lovebloggers
8
posted on 
11/20/2008 3:59:34 PM PST
by 
abb
("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS."  Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
 
To: Lovebloggers
    I effing hope not. I had a Sunday subscription for the last 20 years (my wife wanted it) and I just cancelled it on her suggestion last month. They keep sending me emails saying "We want you back..." so I send them this: 
 
"Please stop sending me these emails and remove it from your list. 
 
 Your paper is partially responsible for the election of an avowed socialist and Marxist who will do more to damage my country than any politician in the past. 
 
 The ongoing decreasing profitability of your paper, coupled with the fiscal policies of the candidate you have endorsed and done all within your power to get elected is only going to hasten its demise. I do not wish to contribute one more cent to erase the smallest amount of red ink your paper is generating. 
 
 So please do not bother sending any more of these emails. I am not, and will never be interested in reading your paper. Ever."
 
Of course, that was yesterday. Today, I got another one from them.
 
9
posted on 
11/20/2008 4:00:29 PM PST
by 
rlmorel
("A barrel of monkeys is not fun. In fact, a barrel of monkeys can be quite terrifying!")
 
To: SkyDancer
    From what I recall - NYT bought the Globe a few years ago. I think they would need to spin the Globe. Yeah checked Yahoo. Hedge fund manager Phil Falcone owns a bunch of NYT stock. I think Phil may not be a Lib but I do not know for sure.
 
10
posted on 
11/20/2008 4:02:02 PM PST
by 
Frantzie
 
To: skeeter
    I was going to say Jim Jones, but he is dead. Come to think of it, the BG may join him. Sooner the better.
Who needs news papers these days. Even the wife has switched to ‘ads on line’ for her grocery shopping.
 
11
posted on 
11/20/2008 4:02:05 PM PST
by 
Tarpon
(America's first principles, freedom, liberty, market economy and self-reliance will never fail.)
 
To: Lovebloggers
    Who - if anyone - will try to save the Boston Globe? 
 
 Dear President Obama: 
 
 We ignored your questionable place of birth, barely mentioned Reverend Wright and Bill Ayers. Your comments in San Francisco, wonderful as we found them, never graced our broadsheets. An analysis of your marxist policies? Not in OUR stalwart newspapers! 
 
 But we have found, as Zogby did recently, that most of the people who voted for you do not read newspapers, much less follow politics (how could they not know about the lovely and brilliant Speaker Pelosi or the faaabulous Barney Frank? The mind reels). As a result, our tried and true bastions of fair and honest journalism are facing financial ruin. That is also due in no small part to those horrid, horrid conservatives who refuse to read our words of progressive genius. 
 
 So howzabout a bailout, Barry? 
 
Very Truly Yours (and Do We Mean That), 
  
 The Boston Globe
  
 The Washington Post
  
 The Lefty Ledger
  
 The Los Angeles Times
  
 The Progressive Prattler
  
 The New York Times
  
 The Marxist Mainsheet
  
 The Seattle Post-Intelligencer 
12
posted on 
11/20/2008 4:05:36 PM PST
by 
LostInBayport
(The press and the Barackolytes view you as a miracle worker...so turn the economy into wine, Barry.)
 
To: Lovebloggers
    Who - if anyone - will try to save the Boston Globe? 
 
 Dear President Obama: 
 
 We ignored your questionable place of birth, barely mentioned Reverend Wright and Bill Ayers. Your comments in San Francisco, wonderful as we found them, never graced our broadsheets. An analysis of your marxist policies? Not in OUR stalwart newspapers! 
 
 But we have found, as Zogby did recently, that most of the people who voted for you do not read newspapers, much less follow politics (how could they not know about the lovely and brilliant Speaker Pelosi or the faaabulous Barney Frank? The mind reels). As a result, our tried and true bastions of fair and honest journalism are facing financial ruin. That is also due in no small part to those horrid, horrid conservatives who refuse to read our words of progressive genius. 
 
 So howzabout a bailout, Barry? 
 
Very Truly Yours (and Do We Mean That), 
  
 The Boston Globe
  
 The Washington Post
  
 The Lefty Ledger
  
 The Los Angeles Times
  
 The Progressive Prattler
  
 The New York Times
  
 The Marxist Mainsheet
  
 The Seattle Post-Intelligencer 
13
posted on 
11/20/2008 4:05:47 PM PST
by 
LostInBayport
(The press and the Barackolytes view you as a miracle worker...so turn the economy into wine, Barry.)
 
To: Lovebloggers
    Pardon me while I laugh.
 
14
posted on 
11/20/2008 4:08:28 PM PST
by 
Past Your Eyes
(All points of view tolerated...as long as they agree with mine.)
 
To: rlmorel
    Offer to buy their paper, then say NO! Not a subscription, the ENTIRE paper; offer them $100 for it.
If they accept, fire their current cabal of writers and editors and publish some good news.
If they look at you funny, tell them to stop making offers that are just as ridiculous, print out and hand them another copy of your e-mail.
 
15
posted on 
11/20/2008 4:10:21 PM PST
by 
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here?   A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
 
To: Frantzie
    Rush says not to gloat when people like that get their portfolios handed to them (or words to that effect) - like it’s not going to buy you one gallon of gas, but, it sure does make me feel like doing a high-five with someone ... egotistical bas***rds .....
 
16
posted on 
11/20/2008 4:11:27 PM PST
by 
SkyDancer
("Talent Without Ambition Is Sad, Ambition Without Talent Is Worse")
 
To: Lovebloggers
    How about the Kennedys? Oh, I forgot...their net worth has plummeted as well.
 
17
posted on 
11/20/2008 4:12:34 PM PST
by 
Huskrrrr
 
To: OneWingedShark
    Liberals operate in what computer networking people like to call “half-duplex” mode, which is more like a walkie-talkie conversation than a phone conversation which is full duplex.
The only problem is, liberals never let go of the talk button on the walkie-talkie, so it is more like “quarter-duplex”.
They completely will never acknowledge my objections. As a matter of fact, my email is only likely to egg them on and incite them to send my email everywhere.
I can handle it. I am used to it. I live in Massachusetts.
 
18
posted on 
11/20/2008 4:27:15 PM PST
by 
rlmorel
("A barrel of monkeys is not fun. In fact, a barrel of monkeys can be quite terrifying!")
 
To: Lovebloggers
    Not many buy the Glob for anything except the classifieds and the comics section.
 Its an EFFIN rag just like the Slimes.
 Americans will read propaganda, but they sure as HAIL won't pay $$ for it.
 Case in POINT:
 
19
posted on 
11/20/2008 4:34:47 PM PST
by 
Candor7
(Fascism? All it takes is for good men to say nothing, ( member NRA)
 
To: Lovebloggers
    I have $50 that says the next push for a federal bailout will be the newspapers of the MSM. 
  Expect to see the publishers and editors whining in front of congress about how they need money to keep from going broke, too. 
 
 As an aside, who do you think was the most ruthless and mean-spirited cinematic newspaper tycoon? 
 
 Raymond Massey as Gail Wynand in 
"The Fountainhead",
  Humphrey Bogart as Ed Hutchison in 
"Deadline USA!",
 
  Or Orson Welles as Charles Foster Kane in 
"Citizen Kane"? 
 
20
posted on 
11/20/2008 4:37:30 PM PST
by 
Emperor Palpatine
("I love democracy. I love Free Republic")
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-33 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson