Oh please! This is so full of grammatical errors and irrelevant ramblings, it’s hard to read without giggling. It’s got a mountain of mismatched verb tenses, manages to spell Madelyn Dunham’s first name two different ways in the same sentence, and repeatedly asserts wrongdoing without citing any particular civil or common law that has been violated. The paragraph about the “Press” (undefined term, but capitalized anyway, in grand Nigerian style) being “liberal” and lacking “journalistic integrity”, is priceless — what exactly is he imagining that a court of law can do with such whining about how the media chooses to exercise its First Amendment rights?
Again, this is an email. Not a publication. She emailed us, I posted it. Post 1 and 2 are formal, without typos etc.
“This is so full of grammatical errors and irrelevant ramblings, it’s hard to read without giggling.”
The problem with the legal profession is it tends to overemphasize process. Truth is defined by content.
The most important skill for lawyers is knowing how, in the smoothest way possible, to process untruth as though it were truth. I will never respect this tendency in the legal profession.