HOZE-EM!!! 
Posted on 11/19/2008 7:02:21 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Last night the Indian Navy Ship Tabar struck a long overdue blow for freedom of the seas by sinking a pirate mother ship in the pirate-infested waters of the Gulf of Aden. At last, the pirates will know that the hijacking party has been crashed.
Some are questioning whether the Tabar acted in self-defense. Ridiculous, they acted in the cause of law and order in support of freedom - a much higher calling.
Perhaps this event will shake other nations out of their unwillingness to address the threat and put together a meaningful military force to eliminate these nautical terrorists who prefer to call themselves businessmen. They make the Mafia look like kindergarteners.
Yes, there are a few military ships in the area, one of which, the Royal Navy HMS Cumberland, engaged other pirates a few days ago. But for all the pirate-suspect ships, the cruise seems pretty unchallenged. Yes, the area is large and the traffic density high, but the pirates have far too many successes. The US Fifth Fleet seems to have a rough time keeping up with the press releases about hijackings.
Pirate hijackings are one of the oldest forms of naval warfare. The more civil term, privateer, was used by the Continental Congress to allow designated ships to attack any British ship during the revolution. The British allowed similar activities and the French attacked both sides. The tables turned after the revolution, as the United States became a world merchant sea power and began to confront the Barbary pirates based in North Africa, specifically Tripoli. These pirates had been terrorizing the Mediterranean basin for centuries and having learned that tribute and ransom could be collected, turned it into a business. Sound familiar?
Young America was drawn into this cyclone because it had no alternative. As resentment grew in Washington, Adams, Jefferson and the Congress, construction of new ships was authorized, which were available when Algiers declared war on the US for not paying tribute. After two wars in 1801-1805 and 1815, the United States obtained freedom of access in that area.
Why this diversion into history? History is starting to repeat itself, but with much higher risk levels. No one seems to know where the ransom money is going. Since Somalia has been a longstanding supporter of Islamic terrorist activity, it seems reasonable to assume that most of this money is going to expand terrorist attacks someplace. I hold this view until proven otherwise.
Millions of dollars a year can support thousands of attacks worldwide. Ransom payments, while very humanitarian, only support wider terrorism. That is why the success of INS Tabar is so important.
What now? The maritime world has evolved into two groups—ships flagged in countries that do not have navies to protect them, and naval powers that do not have merchant ships to protect. International cooperation is a must to cross this abyss. Yes, there is a cooperation group now for this area, but we see the inadequate results. It is time for a Security Council mandated effort with the ship-owning countries and exporting countries paying their share for a change.
Many countries can contribute. This would increase the number of intercept ships capable of doing what INS Tabar did. The US Navy is incapable of providing much help in this area, having destroyed rather than mothballed most of its non-guided missile ships a few years ago. However, it could provide at-sea bases using amphibious ships designed to support assault craft as well as helicopter operations including gunships. I suggest positioning these ships 200-300 miles apart through the affected areas to create corridors for passage. These command ships could be used to direct the activities of the smaller investigative ships or aircraft.
The most important contribution the US could make would be intelligence. If the intelligence community cannot provide good surface images useful for separating and tracking the pirate ships, maybe some commercial activity can. I apologize to my tactician friends in Blue: I am sure you can do much better with a plan using these concepts. Perhaps this work could also apply to the piracy problems in the Straits of Malacca and the South China Sea.
I call this concept the International Anti-Piracy Maritime Surge. It is time to start now.
Thank you, INS Tabar. You have done the world a valuable service. I hope to meet you someday. In the meantime, I wish you Fair Winds and Following Seas.
**************
Everett Pyatt was Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary and Assistant Secretary of the Navy (USA) from 1977 through 1989.
Worth remembering next time someone says the French were on our side.
The pirates are following a creed not much different then the creed socialists and marxists the world over are following.
Steal from the rich, (big corporations) and redistribute the wealth under threat of violence.
France has never “been on our side” but sometimes their interests have dovetailed with ours.
Once these pirates are captured they should be forced to wear the Puffy Shirt for life.
“Spread the wealth”, eh? Where have we heard that before?
***Barbary pirates based in North Africa, specifically Tripoli. These pirates had been terrorizing the Mediterranean basin for centuries and having learned that tribute and ransom could be collected, turned it into a business. Sound familiar? ****
Their term for it was Jihad. Their pirates were Mujehadeen.
Sound familiar?
That’s my point!
“The pirates are following a creed not much different then the creed socialists and marxists the world over are following.
Steal from the rich, (big corporations) and redistribute the wealth under threat of violence.”
Where’s that picture of Obama dressed in pirate gear?
Big corporations are hardly rich, check out the markets.
The vast majority of wealth and tax money comes from small business and their owners.
Big business begs for small business generated funds, so they can continue their fat, bureaucratic lifestyles.
HOZE-EM!!!
Pirates of the Indian Ocean is not a ride in Disneyland kiddies.
That means we (the US) do all the work, build all the infrastructure and pay for all of it.
Right on! - But put on your flame proof suit, befort the FR Corporazi shills attack.
The right tool for the job!
Of course these bloody "International Law" morons have made arming merchant ships completely illegal.
L
We all know that, but the chant of the left is more like what I posted.
But did my point escape you?
Do it again gentlemen, lots of targets!
Wonder why ships don't use private security or, duh!, arm themselves? It would seem that a Ma Deuce and/or some RPGs would be sufficient armament.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.