The "American Constitution Union" (vanity)

The Republican party lost again. We can debate all day long why that occurred. So where do go we from here?

Conservatives, and even Repub loyals have lost big time and we are now facing another FDR, Johnson, Carter expansion of liberal/socialist ideals. If you want to hang tough for Obama's "possible" failings for a Congressional change in 2010, more power to you.

I am suggesting a new tactic: The liberals have used the courts for decades against conservatism and won many many times. I suggest we do the same. It's time Constitutional advocates start using the courts and pushing for Constitutional adherence.

I say forget party loyalty which obviously didn't work out. We conservatives have the historical written documents to back us up. Think of ALL the correspondence between the Founding Fathers and regarding their INTENT.

So, I suggest a NEW Constitutional legal entity be formed. If you don't like the "American Conservative Union" name, than suggest another. It doesn't matter what it is called, it just needs the resources to pay for the lawyers.

"Don't believe this will make a difference now. Looks like they are about to lock up the 60 for the Senate. Obama is a communist, not a socialists, and with the constant lineup of his cabinet, we are toast. Hang on, all we can do is ride it out."

Er, wrong. The US Constitution is very direct in its positions. Plus, there are numerous writings between the Founding Fathers concerning the intent of the original Constitution Convention that built the foundation of our STILL current law-based society.

Obami needs to be proven qualified for the highest office in the land. Now that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has accepted a legal challenge for close-door conferance on DECEMBER 5th, and will probably get 3 others in conference to view Obamis legal status, we may looking at a Constitutional crisis. I say yeah! Bring it on!

If that were not to occur, and Obami gets in the WH without being a "natural-born citizen" of the USA, our system will be null and void. It will be the ultimate destruction of our Republic and time to give up our lives and sacred honor for the defense of said Republic.

All that said, if Obami simply puts out a long form birth certificate that proves he is a "natural born citizen", then no foul. But why is he spending some million dollars to hide his doctor-signed birth certificate? Hawaii allows people to register in state from outside births on a "Certification of Live Birth". That means nothing. Just means someone was born, in no particular place other than what the Mother of Father says.

I am currently looking at my original Certificate of Live Birth as recorded in xxx xxxxxxx, xx on xxxxxxx xx xxxx. It includes the below with redacted parts for my security:

Line 1: Child's first name; xxxxxx; Middle name: xxxxx; Last name; xxxxxx;
Second line: Male; Single; January 20, 1950; 8:47am
Third line: Place of Birth, City: Los Angeles; County: Los Angeles
Fourth, fifth, and sixth lines: Full name and address of HOSPITAL.
Fifth line: Full address of Mother, including county;
Sixth line: City and State of Mother; ,br>Seventh line: Mother's full name; xxxx xxxx xxxx; race - white;
Eighth line: Mothers age; Birthplace; Mailing address;
Ninth line: Father's full name' xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxx; race -white;
10th line: Fathers' age, Birthplace, Occupation, Kind of business;
11th line; Informants signature line: Mother's signature and date;
12th Line: Attendants Certification: Signed by the delivering MD with address;
13th line; Date recorded by Local Registrar with signature and witness;

It reads at the bottom: "This is a certified copy of the record if it bears the seal of the County Recorder imprinted in purple ink"
Fee: $2.00 - xxx,xx,xxxx.
Rxx x xxxx; Country Recorder." The purple seal is imprinted on this document I have used it so many times to show my citizenship. It has gotten so crumpled from carrying it in my wallet over so many years that it's now incased in a protective plastic sleeve. It is the genuine article. Granted, it originates from 1950, however, it is still was is called the "long form" or "vault form", mostly because it has the delivering Doctor's name on it. That is the proof of where a child is born.

THE ABOVE IS A TRUE "CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH" vault or long form as its called, with delivering Doctor, county Registrar signed (with witness) and embossed with State seal. It is not a Certification of Live Birth that Hawaii Secretary of State issues to anyone who wants someone to recognized as just being born. That bogus "live birth" document has no legal bearing as to where the person was born.

The silly little Birth Certificates they give you when you leave the hospital are just for keep sakes when you leave the hospital or possibly in this case, a paper issued to Obamai's mother once she rushed back to Hawaii. If the document does NOT have the delivering MD's signature, it is invalid. Certifications of Live Birth only say you were born, and the parent or guardian can claim the child was born right there or anywhere. IT IS NOT AN OFFICIAL DOCUMENT WITHOUT THE DELIVERING DOCTOR'S NAME AND SIGNATURE!

So where the hell is Obama's Certificate (not certification) of Live Birth, signed by the delivering MD?

Now you know the question at hand. Sorry if I was too repetitious in my delivery (pun intended).

So gee whiz Barry, just pull up the same document I just showed and put an end to this nonsense.

CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH (notice it doesn't say Certifican of Live Birth)

Child' First Name; Last name;
Date of birth;

"Anti-Constitutional judges are for the most part locked in place as long as they live. Anti-Constitutional politicians can be defeated."

That is just the point I'm trying to make. "Anti-Constitutional politicians" are so many and the political machinery is against us now. And while I understand there are many liberal judges out there, the USSC still has SOME semblance of rationality. We take our case all the way to them.

Look, our politicians are about themselves. Our current Federal politicians are about socialism. Our President-Elect is the same. So what is the last bastion of redress? I see it as the United States Supreme Court. They sometimes make rulings we don't like, but they did just re-affirmed the right to gun ownership to protect ourselves. That was huge.

So if the in-coming Executive Branch is full of socialists, and the Congress has what's looking like filibuster-proof power, what is left to keep us from becoming a Europeon type socialist government? The Judicial Branch.

We The People, question/sue every socialist legislation passed by Congress. With enough attempts, if nothing else, Congress just may back down. If not, we tie up their un-Constitutional crap in the courts for years. My god, man, the ACLU and the environmental Nazis have been doing it for decades. Why can't we?

It will just take money, lot's of money. And as someone mentioned to me the other night, it is money taken away from Republican efforts. Personally, I don't give one shit about Republicans anymore. They had their chance and put up old geezers who couldn't compete. Fuck the Republican party.

Let's think about lawsuits to allow us to drill and use or own resources. Let's think about lawsuits that deal with the financial meltdown caused by liberal feel-good sub-prime mortgages brought on by the idiots who refuse to regulate the system (think Waxman and others). Let's look at every single thing the Liberal/socialists are doing to destroy our Republic from within and sue each and every one. Yes, I know that fedgov individuals are immune to lawsuits, but legislation is not immune.

What choice do we have? What? RahRah for the next Republican candidate? Do you want to wait that long, as Obamai turns us into a socialist nation?

I am telling you and anyone reading this that this is our last chance. The Republic is dying. With the Fedgov taking over the financial systems and so much else...where do we go?

We have (3) options:
Accept the coming socialism and the fall of the US as a world power;
Fight everything in the courts on Constitutional principles;
Revolution (not pretty)

I'm open to other options, but can't envision them.

"If the problem is the ACLU and the NLG, why not just target them?"

Surprisingly, you're thinking small. It's not about going head to head with the ACLU, it's about forming a similar organization that will go head to head against law, regulations, restrictions that are contrary to the Founding Fathers INTENT.

Get the money; build the organization; inform the populace why the INTENT is best for them. Yup easier said than done. Unfortunately, I see this as our last best hope. Political parties serve themselves. We may still have the courts to work with.

Bob, you are a bright, informed, connected man. It's people like you that could talk with fed-up Constitutional politicians and build a program. I don't know what your particular issues are nowadays and don't particularly care, but we are losing our Republic exponentially.

If you don't agree with that than no problem. Maybe I'm over-stating things and we can agree to disagree.

However, we will still have to watch our Great Experiment in self-government slowly slip away before our eyes. I'll be okay because I have a wonderful wife and cute little rat dog that gives me joy every day. Maybe some day when we're old and feeble we can reminence about all the times we tried.

End rant. Take care.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.