Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Frost/Nixon One of the Best Films of the Year
AICN ^ | Wednesday, November 19, 2008 - 1:09pm | Massawyrm

Posted on 11/19/2008 4:17:41 PM PST by lewisglad

Frost/Nixon screams For Your Consideration. Directed by Ron Howard and starring Frank Langella as Richard Nixon, and sprinkled with just the sorts of actors who elevate the Oscar buzz factor like Toby Jones and Sam Rockwell, this thing is gonna get talked about over and over again. But the kicker is that this is the real deal. Easily Howard’s best film of the last decade (and arguably his best ever), this film is everything Howard does well brought together into one scintillating barn burner of a drama. The movie is simply incredible. Absolutely incredible.

And to be honest, it’s hard to believe they pulled it off. Not for lack of talent, but the content. This is the story about an interview, pure and simple. There are no backroom sessions screwing people over. There’s no physical danger as an embittered ex-president sicks CIA agents on the interview team. No romantic tension tearing at the characters. It is a battle of wills between one of the most intimidating and cunning Presidents in modern history and a television personality woefully out of his depth. And it is not the stuff of fiction – but historical fact.

What makes it work is that Howard sets this up and delivers it like you would a boxing match. He spends the movie building up this plucky team of investigators who are getting the shot of a lifetime – a bout with the champ. A man no one has been able to defeat in the verbal arena. David Frost was not the man set up to take him down. It was supposed to be Mike Wallace – exactly the type of contender you would put in the ring with a man like Nixon. Instead, with some financial maneuvering and an overconfident opponent looking for an easy win, this interviewer scored a chance at history. And history is what he got. The resulting tale is positively riveting from beginning to end, and watching the verbal sparring between the showy Frost and the stonewalling Nixon is as jarring, tense and thrilling as any boxing match.

This is the Cinderella Man of political biopics. Only it’s better than Cinderella Man.

Everyone in this movie is at the top of their game, from veteran character actors Oliver Platt and the always frenetic Sam Rockwell as Frost’s research team - to the other side, where Toby Jones continues his climb as the go to character actor of the year, giving a great performance as Nixon’s sleazy entertainment agent ‘Swifty’ Lazar. Also in Nixon’s corner is Kevin Bacon, giving a wonderfully moving portrayal of one of the last of the Nixon loyalists, Jack Brennan. But the real story is Langella as Nixon, which truly is, without hyperbole, the single greatest performance of his career. Langella has never been given a role with this much depth, power and range before, and he meets it on all fronts with the tenacity of a man possessed. He is simply astonishing, and it is completely incomparable to his previous work. Michael Sheen, who plays Frost, also gives a powerful performance. But there is this moment in the film when Nixon says to Frost “the thing about being in the limelight is that it only shines on one person,” and I couldn’t help but think about how true that was, even at that very moment. Sheen is acting his butt off, taking a character that amounts to little more than a professional smile and a hairdo and confers upon him a level of depth that makes you really feel for this guy who has bitten off more than he can chew. But as good as he is, every time Langella is onscreen, you can’t take your eyes off of him.

Based upon the play of the same name, these two actors no doubt honed their chemistry performing it together on stage and every bit of that shows here. But this film never feels like a play. Quite the contrary, Howard manages to pace this in a way that keeps it thrilling, exciting and makes you feel more like you are watching a spirited sporting event rather than an interview. Never dull for a moment and positively gripping the whole way through, this movie is going to get itself a lot of Oscar buzz and earns every bit of it.

If ever there was a year for Langella, this is it. Now that Warner Brothers has chosen to pursue best supporting actor for Heath Ledger, the Best Actor category is wide open and Langella has just moved to the position of frontrunner. Handily one of the best films of the year, this NEEDS to be on your must see list. Check this out the very first chance you get.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: frost; hollywood; moviereview; nixon; presidents
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: Finalapproach29er

Amen. If you take the Nixon Presidency and changed only the R to a D and Freepers would rank him with Carter and Clinton.


41 posted on 11/19/2008 5:48:46 PM PST by SlapHappyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Chinstrap61a
Nixon was indicted by his own words on tape. After the tapes were given up, the ball game was over. Halderman and Erlichman, the Republicans on the committee knew that. It seems everyone knows that but you.

Innocent people don't resign the presidency and they don't fire the investigator that's investigating them and their staff on a Saturday night and try to get away with it. That's not what innocent people do.

42 posted on 11/19/2008 5:54:26 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: nufsed
Right. His words on tape imply that he was looking for ways out of the mess, but nothing on the tapes shows any sign that he knew what was being committed by CRP or Dean.

He had a good, solid 6 years of continuous combat with the Left and the press - it shouldn't be too surprising that this was just another fight to him.

You really think that talking about possibly supporting the Watergate defendants compares to LBJ's hash of the Vietnam War, JFK's three near-nuclear war confrontations/assassinations of world leaders, Carter's idiotic trashing of our intelligence agencies/defense department, Clinton's venalities and policy failures..etc.,etc.?

Nixon fired Cox because Cox was Ted Kennedy's hatchet man who was uninterested in indicting the Watergate consprirators and far more interested with investigating every inch of the White House, using every unethical means possible.

Nixon resigned because he recognized that the coup had been played to an indefensible end and he valued the presidency too much to put the country through an impeachment.

Contrast that with "Loverboy" Clinton's performance.

43 posted on 11/19/2008 6:10:14 PM PST by Chinstrap61a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Chinstrap61a

Your living in a fantasy world. Finding ways to bribe participants and saying he could get the money is “finding a way out.” Great and robbery is just a part-time job.


44 posted on 11/19/2008 6:14:02 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: nufsed
Ah yes -

Another one of those diehard Nixon-haters. Suggest you do a little more reading before doing the "high dudgeon" bit.

Nixon is the main reason we aren't facing the Soviets and the Chinese with a hair trigger. He did this despite the endless and relentless hatred of the press and the Left. We owe him a debt of gratitude, not one-dimensional revisionism.

45 posted on 11/19/2008 6:19:40 PM PST by Chinstrap61a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Chinstrap61a
Who said anything about all that. You're creating a straw man to present a view of Nixon I didn't espous, just so you can try to paint me in a bad light. nice try, but no cigar.

I didn't say those things and it means you can't argue your way out of his conspiracy to make a minor crime go away. His actions were worse than that what he tried to cover-up. In the end he lied, he was a crook.

46 posted on 11/19/2008 6:42:21 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: nufsed
I agree with much of what you said about Nixon, but when he said on tape he could get the hush money, the ball game was over. Ever how you want to sat it “They got him:” or whatever, he resigned in disgrace and that is the beginning of any Nixon legacy.

And that is why they can beat us to a bloody pulp and make us pay them for the privilege!

There is such a thing as a pragmatic approach for the greater good. President Nixon was looking for the International Communist link to the liberal Democrats and their Antiwar minions, which we now know in retrospect, was a fact.

47 posted on 11/19/2008 7:18:24 PM PST by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister

If you have to be a crook to be president, then you’re correct. But don’t count me in the herd of sheep.


48 posted on 11/19/2008 7:22:32 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: nufsed
Ah yes - a conspiracy.

Here we have an all-out war going 10,000 miles away, 58,000 dead, 250,000 wounded (I was one of these), the Israelis fighting for their existence after Sadat crossed the Suez and the Syrians came from the Golan, we have a pro-NVA 5th column carrying enemy flags in the streets, the cities have gone up in flames in the riots..and you prissily point out that he was in a "conspiracy" to try to keep his government alive.

Good to have perspective, isn't it?

49 posted on 11/19/2008 7:54:34 PM PST by Chinstrap61a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Argus

The only thing about Langella is that he’s about 6’5”, whereas Nixon was only about 5’10”. I hope they compensate for that in the movie.


50 posted on 11/19/2008 10:09:45 PM PST by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Chinstrap61a
He was an outstanding president and we will probably have to wait for decades before someone really gets the truth out on that period of our history.

Those are my sentiments as well.

I know we swim against the tide.

51 posted on 11/19/2008 11:38:55 PM PST by happygrl (BORG: Barack 0bama Resistance Group: we will not be assimilated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: happygrl
You got THAT right! It has become a solid article of faith that Nixon was a "crook", thanks to a Leftist-slanted educational system and indifferent study of the history.

I would love to see a study of what the world might have been like if Nixon had been elected in 1960 instead of John Kennedy. The confrontations between the Soviets and the US that came so close to thermonuclear war would likely not have happened, the Vietnam War would almost certainly not have happened, and while we wouldn't have had "Camelot", we wouldn't have spent ourselves into the dirt the way Kennedy and LBJ did.

There would have been a whole lot more of us alive if Daley's machine hadn't shoved Kennedy on us instead of Richard Nixon.

52 posted on 11/20/2008 2:49:54 AM PST by Chinstrap61a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Chinstrap61a
The conspiracy was to cover up a crime. There's never a convenient time to indict a president. Keep ignoring the facts all you want.

Prissy

53 posted on 11/20/2008 5:32:43 AM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: nufsed
"Prissy" pretty well covers it.. You should change your Free Republic handle to that.

Nothing that you have expressed is any different than what is being pushed as "history" by today's Leftist educational system. As long as go along with that, you'll fit in fine.

54 posted on 11/20/2008 6:42:37 AM PST by Chinstrap61a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Chinstrap61a
Nixon was indicted by his own words. It has nothing to do with leftists or eductaion or anything else except for your refusal to accept facts.

I'll change my name to prissy if you change yours to shill.

55 posted on 11/20/2008 7:42:42 AM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: nufsed
I see.

Never mind that a wartime sitting president was thrown out of office by a hostile (and pro-enemy) press, opposition party, and "antiwar" movement (that was by the way, in continuous contact with Hanoi throughout the war).

Never mind that the methods used to get him out of office were slimy, underhanded, and unethical and would cause these tactics to become the standard now for all of our political culture, from that time forward.

Never mind that Nixon was the one guy to defuse the Cold War and get the policies of American adminstrations to stop with the provocative acts (like JFK's campaign of assassinations).

Never mind that JFK and LBJ were far more venal, far more corrupt - but had the advantage of a sympathetic, even fawning press to cover things up for them.

Yup, No matter what the damage was to our country and our future, we should have always have gone after Nixon.

Perspective, please.

56 posted on 11/20/2008 10:40:26 AM PST by Chinstrap61a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Chinstrap61a

Well done.

You are absolutely correct.

Young un’s here need to read your posts on this thread to understand what went down before, during and after Watergate.

Richard Nixon was targeted by the odious Left from his days on HUAC. With a fully compliant, propagandizing LeftMedia and a key contribution from a cowardly little, back-stabbing rat-faced weasel named John Dean, they finally achieved their revenge in Watergate.


57 posted on 11/20/2008 10:53:56 AM PST by EyeGuy (Obama will deliver America on a Leash to an envious world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Chinstrap61a
The war was winding down. We had three presidents during the war. Perhaps you'd want to keep LBJ in office because it was war time.

The process leading to his resignation was constitutional and within the power of congress.

Here's a hint. If the other party is in power and you're not popular and you keep a personal enemies list, don't say into a tape machine in your own office that you can get money to hush up witnesses and the accused. Not a good idea. Not very presidential.

You carry on with your job at the Nixon library. I'm sure your history book will be on the fiction best seller list.

58 posted on 11/20/2008 12:10:13 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

I saw a preview for this in September and it looked painfully boring. Insomnia cure boring. And I find Nixon fascinating.


59 posted on 11/20/2008 12:14:13 PM PST by dilvish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dilvish
It shows how dull the best picture nominees are going to be this year.

'Che', 'Frost/Nixon,' 'Doubt,' & 'Milk' as opposition sounds like a winner for Eastwood and Gran Torino.

60 posted on 11/20/2008 12:19:51 PM PST by lewisglad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson