Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bull Market; rabscuttle385

“Yes, it is. Democrats are easier to defeat once they inevitably expose themselves. “

Au contraire, incumbent democrats are extremely difficult to defeat.

McPain is nothing now but a tired old hack ,he’s done his damage. Like I said I fervently hope the bastard isn’t renominated but to hope he goes down to that disgusting marxist dyke uh-uh, giving the rats another Senate seat for 6 long years or 30 if the b1tch gets entrenched as rat senators tend to do, uh-uh, that kind of reasoning is just as sure a path to a permanent minority as handing over the leadership of the GOP to people like John McCain. Nothing good will or even can happen in Washington (and terrible *hit is very likely to happen) with 58/60/70 marxist pig socialist labor senators. This is bigger than John McPain.


92 posted on 11/19/2008 9:33:42 PM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: Impy

I just don’t buy it anymore. McCain practically endorsed Obama while running “against” him. I see no difference between McCain and a Democrat except McCain has the support of both parties. That makes him far more dangerous than a Democrat, especially a junior one, could ever be.


96 posted on 11/19/2008 11:10:56 PM PST by Bull Market (The Neo-Con experiment failed. John McCain deserved to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson