Posted on 11/16/2008 6:56:53 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
The last two shots were 0.7 seconds apart.
No they weren’t.
Unfortunately for your argument, yes there were two shots fired 0.7 seconds apart and I can PROVE it. If you look at the video below, you’ll see this isn’t proof but it is rather convincing,isn’t it?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8_kIDP4EQ0
Thanx
all so silly....everything bit of evidence points to one person only...LHO.
The close up video also shows the driver did not shoot Kennedy, last years favorite theory.
Please explain what your proof is here. This is where the discussion is. If we want to view the video for a fuller explanation we can do that, but this discussion isn’t taking place on YouTube.
Oswald shot Kennedy. It's as powerful and compelling of a case as ever happens. There is no compelling evidence of any conspiracy. So why is this such a tough call?
Too bad it wasn’t “Frazier, Buell’s Day Off.”
[Let me take an old flash picture of you directly into your face. I want to see you wink.]
You need to look at the picture again, he is in partial shadow, standing behind Lady Bird Johnson. No flash right in the face at all, winking ONE eye and grinning a big grin. Johnson is grinning right back at him.
There are however, several groups with some very strong motivation. One of the elements of committing a crime.
What he was, was the one person in all this who really was crazy. Just read his testimony.
No, this is poor reasoning.
Motiviation is needed to commit a crime. Motivation is not evidence that a particular person did the crime. Anyone can have motive, while only the criminal does the act.
Motive can be a lead, causing further investigation, but it is not evidence.
The close up video also shows the driver did not shoot Kennedy, last years favorite theory.
That “theory” was not even a wild a#$@D guess, it was silly.
In the YOUTUBE video I talk about diverse sources of information. There are several witnesses who talk about the last two shots “almost on top of each other.” If you look at any of the various versions of the Z film, you’ll notice that Connally falls foward and then over into Nellie’s lap AFTER the fatal head shot to JFK.
Connally said in several interviews that the force of the bullet knocked me over.... You don’t see Connally knocked over until AFTER JFK’s fatal head shot.
The Warren Commission said that Nellie pulled John over into her lap, which she did, but it was AFTER John was shot in the back at Z frame 325. I show in the YOUTUBE video that John’s head snaps downward when he is shot, that’s how you can identify the exact moment the bullet hits Connally in the back.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8_kIDP4EQ0
Some young guy named “Chris”? interviewed him with pretty good questions, and it makes you wonder “who” stopped this kind of interview from happening before the election...and are they rubbing it in now, showing they could have done it but didn’t want too?
nufsed
Ok, pick someone. Tell in exact detail how someone or anyone could have killed Kennedy if it wasn’t Oswald.
.
Good observation potlatch!
Can you address the possibility that Connely is bending down to avoid any further shots?
Lol, thanks devolve. I’ve been in a thousand flash pictures and do you know I never once winked one eye?? heh.
How does Oswald take a pot shot at the head of the John Birch Society and avoid going to jail?
Was this normal in Texas in the 1960s? You could shoot at people as long as you missed??? weird. ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.