Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UAW leader: Workers will make no more concessions
The Napa Valley Register / The Associated Press ^ | November 15, 2008 | Mark Williams

Posted on 11/15/2008 2:52:01 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-160 last
To: stockpirate
Republicans are going to filibuster the bill!

I hope they stick to their guns. What do they have to lose, the union vote?

141 posted on 11/15/2008 7:30:58 PM PST by stevio (Crunchy Con - God, guns, guts, and organically grown crunchy nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: stevio

**Republicans are going to filibuster the bill!**

Not holding my breath on that one... I might not believe it, even if they DO IT!!


142 posted on 11/15/2008 7:40:46 PM PST by gwilhelm56 (HITLER offered Hope and Change!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Can you imagine if they don’t get the bailout and have to take a pay cut? The vehicles won’t be worth buying either.


143 posted on 11/15/2008 7:41:53 PM PST by stevio (Crunchy Con - God, guns, guts, and organically grown crunchy nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: stevio

** The vehicles won’t be worth buying either.**

Ah yes, back to the FIESTA, VEGA, and the CHEVETTE

GOD Help US all!!


144 posted on 11/15/2008 7:46:45 PM PST by gwilhelm56 (HITLER offered Hope and Change!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Or else...

145 posted on 11/15/2008 7:47:53 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Barack Obama: In Error and arrogant -- he's errogant!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: JSteff
Are you sure? Most of the Toyota plants in the U.S. are not union.

Yes, I am sure as far as any plant owned by the Big 3 goes. Toyota was not part of the compact signed back in the 1930’s.

Here is a link to the UAW’s version of how things went down
http://www.uawlocal1999.org/UAWHistory/default.asp

The spin is nauseating but the basic facts are correct. If you want a non-union American car company you have to build one from the ground up. Ford, GM and Chrysler are fair caught in the union web.

146 posted on 11/15/2008 7:49:45 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (Faith Manages)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

>>>>>>They never talk about using wages, insurance and benefits when talking about other professions.<<<<<

All companies did and do in finance/accounting departments of Silicon Valley hi tech non-union industries I’ve worked in. Also, professions like CPA firms certainly need to know the direct costs like Ins, retirement etc as well as training, conferences, staff meetings & other non-chargeable items like idle time to make sure billing covers all the employee costs for the qtr or the budget year.

The smaller the company the less formal the analysis needs to be but I’m willing to bet that in any on-going company somebody in sr mgmt has a good handle on total employee costs beyond just the direct costs.


147 posted on 11/15/2008 8:52:50 PM PST by all_mighty_dollar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“”Would you buy a car from a bankrupt automaker?” he asked.”

I can tell you I am not buying a car from an automaker who pays people to stay home and then wants my tax dollars to keep them home.

NO way, NO how.


148 posted on 11/15/2008 9:25:25 PM PST by EQAndyBuzz ("Control the information, you control the people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback; All
Earlier this year I was behind a Ford with an extra-large bumper-sticker that proclaimed that it was built, owned and driven by Americans. My immediate thought was, “So was the Honda in the next lane...what’s your point?”

From my last post:
The Foreign Car Companies do not MANUFACTURE here. They do low tech final assembly. There is a gigantic difference between design, research and development, prototyping, etc and doing final assembly like the drones do in a US Toyota or Honda plant. Don't you see this. Have you ever worked for a high tech or a manufacturing company. Anyone who has can tell you the difference between Manufacturing and Final Assembly. All the technology and the profits go off shore. The know how is lost if we lose the Auto Companies. This has a profound influence on our economy and way of life. We could not have won WWII if not for the Manufacturing Prowesss that our auto companies had. We simple would not have had the know how, the tooling, and the type of people necessary. Now Slivertongue do you see my point.
149 posted on 11/15/2008 10:45:06 PM PST by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: truthguy
Now Slivertongue do you see my point.

Thank you for the gratuitous insult, it makes your point so much more compelling.

To answer your other question, I have worked in computer consulting, but not as a consultant; I was a recruiter who placed consultants and some of our clients were high tech manufacturers like Hamilton Sundstrand.

That said, my answer to you is not based on my time there, but on common sense. Maybe there's some Econ 201 in here, but mostly it's just seeing the forest and the trees. Sorry to put it that way, but that's the way it is.

There are three--and only three--things that are going to happen here:

1. Detroit will be bailed out, and the companies will be right back where they are now in short order. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but soon. Maybe before the end of the Obama administration. If you doubt me, see "Chrysler, bailout of."

2. Detroit will not be bailed out, the union will continue to refuse to deal with economic reality, and the companies will enter bankruptcy.

3. Detroit will not be bailed out, the union will get a grip on reality, and the companies will fumble, mumble and stumble but eventually make their way out of this mess.

Now, if these companies go bankrupt it's possible it could lead to liquidation, but I don't buy it. Remember how we were told that the Wall Street bailout was necessary to get frozen credit markets moving, or none of us would be able to buy cars or get home loans? Guess what? Paulson's going to use it to buy stock instead. Fool me once, shame on you and all that.

What is far, far more likely is that they'll work something out with their creditors if they go into bankruptcy, as has happened over and over again when large corps go bankrupt. But let's look at your scenario. What would have to happen for it to come to fruition?

1. Every investment group (either existing now or that could be formed to do the deal) ignores the chance to own all the great things these companies embody. None of them are interested in the trillions in potential profits these companies offer if they can get back on track.

2. The UAW refuses to budge even when it's clear the very reason for their existence is about to disappear.

3. Liquidation happens and the assets are only bought by companies that have no interest in designing, building or testing cars in the U.S., i.e., non-car companies or foreign car companies. Note that this would require that this wouuld require that the foreign car companies who bought the stuff to use it only for their own designs and flush all of Detroit's intellectual capital down the toilet.

4. Even though the United States has a shortage of engineers, all the guys and gals who make up the knowledge base of these companies move to Japan, Germany, Korea, Sweden and Italy.

To say that chain of events strikes me as unlikely is to understate.

The good news is that I have a new idea to save the car companies that you'll like very much. I'll ping you when I post it.

150 posted on 11/16/2008 9:25:55 AM PST by Mr. Silverback ("[Palin] has not even lived in the Lower 48 since 1987. Come on! Really!" --Polybius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

I’m not sure if it’s the same plant, but I recall reading an article about a steel plant in the Southwest that was hurting. I can’t remember if this place got rid of the union completely or just forced a change in relationship. One thing I do remember vividly is that (under the old way of doing things) if a lightbulb burned out they had to call immediately call in a union electrician to change it.

Once they did away with stupid crap like that and the point of the compensation plan was to pay a man a day’s wages for a day’s work, the plant became a solid profit operation. Gee, what a surprise.


151 posted on 11/16/2008 12:39:56 PM PST by Mr. Silverback ("[Palin] has not even lived in the Lower 48 since 1987. Come on! Really!" --Polybius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The retirement plan will disappear with the Corporation. Did they think of that?


152 posted on 11/16/2008 12:41:44 PM PST by RightWhale (Exxon Suxx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude

Interestingly, in the newspaper (I use that as a source for the left wing media) this a.m., it seems the unions are going to fight their way into Texas and other right to work states.

Seems there is some legislation in the works to make their job easier.

1. The card check process would replace the secret ballot.

2. An arbitrator would impose a contract if union and management can’t agree on terms within 120 days of of the union’s creation. There is no deadline at this time.

What a lousy time for the ‘Pubs to be in the minority.


153 posted on 11/16/2008 4:00:59 PM PST by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

“F**k you!”

Nice. Do you kiss your mother, (or daughter) with that mouth?


154 posted on 11/16/2008 8:10:28 PM PST by JSteff (It was ALL about SCOTUS. Most forget about that and may have doomed us for a generation or more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
All Republicans should oppose any bailout to the auto industry.
155 posted on 11/16/2008 8:14:30 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VOA

Let the UAW buy the Big three. That will solve there problem......................

Then the rest of the US tax payer won’t get screwed over buy the unions......


156 posted on 12/14/2008 6:14:52 AM PST by WRD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Knute
The problem is with that it will be an open door for the Obamster to absorb the 1/2 million people covered by these cost on the Federal dole while the VEBA which kicks in 2010 will pass these cost off to the UAW. Hence the bridge loans to get their. But that is a mute point, it has gotten lost so many time in the discussion in the last three weeks it isn't funny. BTW I believe Ford has been making periodic payments to the VEBA and either has 1 or 4 payments left to go.
157 posted on 12/14/2008 6:22:42 AM PST by taildragger (Palin / Mulally 2012.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gwilhelm56

Worse than that, they have a huge resort facility in Michigan a lodge for the “Working Man” Glof Course etc. I think they are trying to unload it.


158 posted on 12/14/2008 6:31:04 AM PST by taildragger (Palin / Mulally 2012.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

**I guess $72/hour is just barely enough to put food on the table these days.**

To BE FAIR, about half of that $72/hr is actually Gross Paycheck..
/sarc

FAIR MY A**, that’s still 2 to 3 times the Average American paycheck..

UAW .. YOU BAIL OUT GM ..with YOUR OWN DAMN MONEY!!


159 posted on 12/14/2008 6:39:43 AM PST by gwilhelm56 (Orwell's "1984" .. to Conservatives- a WARNING, to Liberals - a TEXTBOOK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: realcleanguy
Kind of amazing. The Unions would rather the UAW workers lost their jobs rather than take a pay cut. Simply amazing

Naw, not amazing at all.

I watched the meat cutter union force Safeway Grocery chain in the Dallas / Ft Worth area close 141 stores in 1987 let go of several thousand employees because they did not want to pay a higher percentage of the medical premiums even with a small pay increase. Net overall it would have cost the union thugs about a > 2% decrease in pay.They were making at the time $15.00 hr. with free medical bennies

Every person employed by Safeway I spoke to (I was a vendor calling on them) never thought the union would force them out of jobs.

Most were very shocked when they were out on their ass

The saddest part is most of the stores were bought up and rehired many of the same people but at a much lower pay scale

160 posted on 12/14/2008 7:16:21 AM PST by Popman (Dont worry Barney Frank has your ass-ets covered!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-160 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson