To: fieldmarshaldj
Its strange. Roger Calero has gotten his name on the ballot in several states despite being an admitted non citizen in two presidential elections so far. It’s easy to ignore since he’s a minor (socialist) candidate who doesn’t win, but what would happen if he did?
Nobody is minding the store.
17 posted on
11/14/2008 7:15:36 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
To: cripplecreek
They know what’s happening, they’re just not doing anything about it. Like the Chicago PD in the ‘20s and ‘30s.
45 posted on
11/14/2008 7:26:52 PM PST by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
To: cripplecreek
Yep, lack of leadership continues in the Bush Administration.
Instead of Bush giving Obama a welcome and briefing, he should have publically said he would work with Obama on transition after Obama’s citizenship qualification is proven.
240 posted on
11/14/2008 9:26:48 PM PST by
OldArmy52
(Change a Socialist can believe in: Vote Obama. Your dog and dead Gramma did.)
To: cripplecreek
That’s amazing that he was able to get his name on the ballot. If he’s inelligible, then his name has no business being on the ballot.
426 posted on
11/15/2008 12:35:50 AM PST by
Pinkbell
(Liberals are only tolerant of those with whom they agree.)
To: cripplecreek
Excuse me if I am wrong but IMHO from what I have read,over the past few months studying all this mirage, you are actually allowed to run for Potus if you are foreign born but,you can not hold the office. Don't ask for the links,or worse yet the logic, I lost them months ago.
1,257 posted on
11/16/2008 4:43:36 AM PST by
rodguy911
(HOME OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE--GO SARAHCUDA !!)
To: cripplecreek
Roger Calero has gotten his name on the ballot in several states despite being an admitted non citizen in two presidential elections so far. It's an interesting quirk of constitutional law. The Constitution doesn't forbid, say, a 21 year old felon from Argentina from *running* for office, they simply can't *hold* office. Now, since the latter obviously follows from the former, you'd think that there would be a requirement to prove that you meet the Constitutional requirements when filing to run, but there isn't.
2,415 posted on
11/20/2008 12:46:22 PM PST by
Terabitten
(To all RINOs: You're expendable. Sarah isn't.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson