Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ban on Gay Marriage Got the Black Vote (In Florida)
Miami New Times ^ | November 13, 2008 | Bob Norman

Posted on 11/14/2008 4:42:37 PM PST by nickcarraway

Amendement 2 oppresses another minority.

Last week, an anti-gay marriage measure passed statewide, garnering a majority of votes in every Florida county but Monroe. The ballot was one of the great paradoxes in American politics: The black community, the most oppressed group in U.S. history, comprised one of the unfriendliest demographics toward gays.

C. Stiles S.F. Mahee wanted to flee the state after the vote. Subject(s): Amendement 2, gay marriage banS.F. Mahee worked as the Broward organizer for Florida Red and Blue, which backed the measure. She is also a black lesbian who has urged the African-American community to take a stake in gay issues.

"Speculation is that the momentous turnout that Senator Obama provided may have actually hurt us in the end," she says. "If you can make the connection about discrimination, then African-Americans are overwhelmingly with us. But if someone else focuses on homosexuality, then we lose African-Americans."

When she got up the morning after the election, her first impulse was to flee the state. Then she learned Arizona and California, one of the nation's more progressive states, had passed virtually the same initiative the same day.

"I am in absolute and complete awe," she says. "I am in awe that we can elect the first African-American president and that on the same day, we can write discrimination into the state constitution. Our education is at the bottom of the heap. We have a state House that just had to apologize for its participation in slavery last session. We have a gay adoption ban. I am afraid Florida has become in this millennium what Mississippi was to the civil rights movement."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: bho2008; blackvote; fl2008; homosexualagenda; perverts; samesexmarriage

1 posted on 11/14/2008 4:42:37 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Apparently African-Americans didn’t get the memo that having the right to marry someone wearing a leather mask walking on all fours is a ‘civil right’.


2 posted on 11/14/2008 4:45:51 PM PST by exist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
SO are the queery queens going to attack blacks now like they are attacking the mormons? going to run in to their churches and riot......
3 posted on 11/14/2008 5:04:52 PM PST by CanadianMusherinMI (drill baby drill/mine baby mine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

There is no discrimination! They have all the rights we have. Marriage is by definition between ONE MAN AND ONE WOMAN. Any man can marry one woman, and any woman can marry one man. Two men can’t marry, nor can two women. Black people are smart. They know this doesn’t compare to their civil rights plight.


4 posted on 11/14/2008 5:27:06 PM PST by Pinkbell (Liberals are only tolerant of those with whom they agree.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CanadianMusherinMI

5 posted on 11/14/2008 5:28:22 PM PST by Pinkbell (Liberals are only tolerant of those with whom they agree.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

bandwidth exceeded? damn...i should have purchased a bigger pair of jogging pants:(


6 posted on 11/14/2008 5:31:26 PM PST by CanadianMusherinMI (drill baby drill/mine baby mine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“we can write discrimination into the state constitution. “

But we discriminate all the time.

You can’t marry your cousin. Or your dog. Or two other people. Or a minor. Or your mom.

Discrimination is not always a bad thing. Think about it.


7 posted on 11/14/2008 8:39:40 PM PST by Marie2 (Everything the left does has the effect and intent of destroying the traditional family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

What’s with this gay argument about being “denied civil rights”. A gay man still has every right to marry a woman. Same as a hetero guy. He does not have the “right” to marry his boyfriend, his brother, or his dog. What’s so hard to understand?????


8 posted on 11/14/2008 9:48:39 PM PST by XHogPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot
What’s with this gay argument about being “denied civil rights”.

It's all part of an Evan Wolfson-brainstormed clone of the arguments that won case after case for the NAACP before the Warren Court in the 50's and 60's.

Gays have to a) identify as an objectively differentiated group of human beings (hence the "essentialist" canard: all gays are all gay, all the time, from birth, by genetic differentiation) -- making homosexuality the (phony) equivalent of race or skin color, to make the legal fraud work, and then b) they have to claim natural rights and "discrimination", following exactly the old NAACP script.

That's the plan.

The coup de grace will be an Article IV attack on all States that don't recognize "homomarriage", using the sham marriages pretended at in Massachusetts and Noo Groinzy (they must have closet cases on the NJ supreme court, Wolfson and his buddies keep going back there).

For years, the gay lawyers were shut out of the U.S. Supreme Court because "gay marriage" didn't exist anywhere.

Now they can complain, courtesy of the Massachusetts conspiracy and coup (which Mitt Romney did nothing about -- hell, he should have called out the Massachusetts National Guard and sent their gay supreme court home rather than let them rule!).

And the only thing that will keep Swishy Souter from writing a Great Gay Manifesto forcing gay affirmation on everyone (and perforce closeting every Levitical religion) will be an amendment to the Constitution.

9 posted on 11/15/2008 4:24:20 AM PST by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson