[Laissez-faire capitalist]

Christophobic homosexuals are also attacking blacks and Latinos in California calling them haters, discriminators and so on.

Just because they supported Proposition 8...

Were it not for Latinos and blacks, Prop 8 would not have passed, since a slight majority of whites voted against Prop 8, and a slight majority of Latinos and 70% of blacks voted for Prop 8.

[Philly Nomad]

Right, the blacks and latinos have nobody but themselves to blame for this.

[cripplecreek]

This keeps up, it won’t end well.

[walford]

The Left really don’t like democracy unless the ‘masses’ have been duped into voting their way. Even the biased media didn’t help them on this one — in California, no less.

[Laissez-faire capitalist]

Conservative churches and conservatives better get mobilized like never before.

Homosexuals don’t care about the ballot box. It’s just a formality to them.

If it comes down to both sides engaging in endless lawsuits that bog this country down until most of America finally says that its had enough and says to always leave things like this alone after its been voted on, then so be it.

That’s what it has come to...

[MarkT]

Back in the late 60’s, the homosexulal refrain was “just leave us alone, all we want to do is live our lives.” Now, as predicted, it is “do it or else.”

[Red Badger]

Baseball bats along with the hymnals and bulletins in the back of the pews would put a stop to this, pronto...........

[sanatan2000]

Anti-Romney-Mormons freepers must be happy.

[bboop]

‘When they came for the Mormons, I did nothing ....’ It is going to get worse before the Battle is won.

[TexasCajun]

Sore HomoLosers !!

[yefragetuwrabrumuy]

Back in Weimar Germany, the National Socialists also loudly proclaimed themselves victims of the oppressive democratic regime, which did everything in its power to give the Nazis the benefit of the doubt as well.

[fella]

Can our crystal night be far away. “You will be persecuted for my name’s sake.”

[Burkean]

There’s a big difference between homosexual and asexual. Most Catholics would consider Jesus to be asexual, at least that’s what I drew from my years of catechiam.

[onedoug]

Homos for civilization? America upside down.

[polymuser]

.

Churches need to have their exorcism rite at the ready for such attackers.

.

[goldstategop]

They can't accept a loss gracefully and move on. They have to shove their perverted lifestyle in every one else's faces. As if temper tantrums and rage will get them what they want. Life's not fair. Deal with it!

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

[Klepto]

Jesus a homo? I say if you wander around the desert for years with a bunch of guys who barely bathe that the LAST thing you’re going to be is homosexual. =)

[Awestruck]

I am not afraid of this bad behavior by the homofacists because it shows their true colors to the rest of the lazy, hide their head in the sand, wimpy, “conservatives” who either didn’t vote or voted against 8 in a “live and let live” attitude. We are in a spiritual war here..and if the wimps can be convinced that there really is an enemy, then society as a whole might have a chance.

[Nea Wood]

What do they hope to accomplish with this? Do they think all these churchgoing folks are going to say, “Well, golly gee whillikers! We can see now that we’ve been unfair to all those lovely, tolerant people protesting outside. Let’s reverse Prop 8”? This is so stupid. It’s not going to change anyone’s mind, OR undo the voting that’s already taken place.

[ncpatriot]

Does anyone take pictures of these protests?

[Safrguns]

The homosexual agenda is NOT to gain equal rights in marriage... it is to force the government to dis-avow religion all-together. The ultimate purpose is to eradicate religious practice... not to be part of it.

Homosexual marriage is an abomination before God. It is a public statement that God condones the behavior. It literally MOCKS an institution established by God.

At the same time, there is NO DENYING that our governmental institutions encourage this faith based institution in it's laws and regulations. FAVOR IS SHOWN for believers who wish to be married.

At the core of this impasse is an understanding of the true meaning of 'separation of Church and State'.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Laws which encourage the practice of religion do not violate the first amendment, because the religion itself is not established. Encouragement of a practice is not the establishment of religion. HOWEVER... defining something such as marriage (such as what has been done with prop 8) can arguably be said to be just that, even though the language itself is not specific to religion. Why??? because the laws which govern marriage do reference religious authorities such as pastors or priests who are AUTHORIZED or REGISTERED with the state to perform such ceremonies.

"... By the authority of God and the laws of this state I do hereby pronounce you man and wife"

What the homosexuals have is an apparent conflict in our own constitution. How can a government which guarantees the free exercise of religion also be capable of protecting it without defining or establishing it? Our republic was founded under christian principles and values and yet was vague in it's definition to grant those with differing religious views to share in the same freedom. We are either one nation UNDER God, or we are not.

The homosexuals are trying to force government to recognize that it cannot have it both ways, and that siding with religion is simply not possible because there is no way to accurately define it to everyone's satisfaction.