Posted on 11/14/2008 2:46:09 AM PST by Cindy
That's really the bottom line, isn't it?
Especially after five years of living in the People’s Republic of Bostonistan, you betch!
It depends. For instance, French and anarchist might be a redundancy of language.
I once were on a train in Germany and anarchists were descending to Berlin to protest Bush’s visit. All German anarchists had a train ticket and were quiet, aside from their bright shirts and funky hair dos.
Then there were 4 french guys, working at a bank with suit and ties, there, chatting around, and going to Berlin for business. They all got fined for having no tickets and protested loudly and rudely ...
Aside from that, anarchists have a love hate relation with tyranny. They mostly involve themselves in gratuitous acts, all supporting terrorism to various degrees, but they all also look for government handouts, gratuity and “free orders” of combat, if that makes any sense. It only has to feel gratuitous in their mind and they love it. A cop behaving badly is an act of anarchists to them and they will vet it if the cop uses his powers for rioting.
It basicaly a form of self-isolating fashion communist.
Yes, all of it, all institutions.
The anarchists have been active forever but especially since the French revolution. Alqaida is merely more of the same.
Anarchists are a form of Moonbat, no?
Few of these people ever bother looking ahead. I remember the Seattle riots years ago, and when they interviewed some of the perps, I laughed when I saw them wearing retail clothing instead of animal skins. Anarchists are usually fringe individuals who destroy stuff in big temper tantrums because the politics does not give them their way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.