Posted on 11/13/2008 3:14:13 PM PST by GOPsterinMA
Barack Obama hadnt even clinched the 2008 election when a prominent Republican pollster took soundings on his partys 2012 prospects. Neil Newhouses survey produced a surprising result.
Vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin, often touted recently as the next GOP front-runner, finished third behind two 2008 also-rans, former Govs. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts and Mike Huckabee of Arkansas.
(Excerpt) Read more at bostonherald.com ...
There was a poll that showed her at 65% vs 11% each for
Romney and Huck.
I’m ok with any of the above but Romney. There is somthing
so Nixon about him.
GOP- and America-backstabber Myth Romney purports
that Romney LEADS for 2012 (as he planned when
carpetbagger-shapeshifter Romney threw Election 2008 to Obama).
If they are ever going to regain prominence, conservatives need to caucus and select one viable candidate by 2010.
Otherwise, they may find themselves in a 2008 repeat — several conservative/moderates splitting the delegate votes so the moderate globalist old boy gets the nomination -— again.
2010 is more important
Particularly for left overs. I am convinced that Palin and Jindal are the future, if there is to be one. If the professional politicians rule the roost, things will get even worse. Someone has to become a "trust buster" if we are to move beyond insider "RINOS". IMHO
2008 - 2012 will be very interesting!!
but for now, I’m having a time with ......
referring to President Bush as - Mr. Bush......
then addressing Barack Obama as President Elect Obama.....
My suggestion - Mr. Elect Obama.
Fair and Balanced.
Hear me FoxNews!!
Madam or Sir, has Mitt Romney personally offended you or someone close to you?
Everyone that visits this site knows that you hate Mitt. No need to keep repeating it again and again again and again again and again again and again again and again again and again again and again again and again..........
What about 2010?
I agree. Let's first focus on 2010.
Gov Palin says to work on 2010 first order of business.
IMHO thinking about 2012 is not practical without rebuilding the base.
Educated people note that Romney is also a loser and backstabber.
What is your point?
I will never refer to that person (Obamarx, that is)as “president”.
You’re correct. It would be sweet to pick up some of the governorships, for sure. House and Senate - not so promising IMO.
The entire House is up for election in 2010. All of them. Of the 25 million Republicans available, it should be possible to find some who wouldn’t mind a couple years in DC fixing the mess.
Just what we need in 2012 the two people most heavily involved in Identity politics and most guaranteed to divide the GOP.
Both Huckabee and the Mittster need to walk away and do what is best for this country, the GOP, and conservatives.
Just Say No!
I think the key to 2010 is to make a convincing argument that the Democrats are responsible for the financial crisis. Since the truth is that they ARE the ones that are responsible, this should not be very difficult. However, it must be a forceful and convincing argument which will make sure the voter anger will be directed squarelty where it belongs.
Just make sure no RINOs run in the primary. The press and the cross voting dems and indpendants (the ones pulling republican ballots in the primaries) won’t know what to do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.