Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Borges

I wouldn’t be shocked if Pat jumps up to defend the guy.


3 posted on 11/13/2008 7:57:06 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: mnehrling
Buchanan's original defense of this guy -- and others -- was pretty comprehensive and was spot-on in many respects.

For one thing, he was adamantly opposed to the notion that an American charged with a crime in a foreign country should be extradited anywhere except the country where the alleged crime took place. The Ukrainian and/or German governments apparently had no interest in prosecuting him, so it seemed pretty bizarre to have him extradited somewhere else just because another government did. This is something worth thinking about for anyone who is familiar with the cockamamie ideas surrounding the International Criminal Court, war crimes tribunals for U.S. government officials, etc.

As I remember it, Buchanan's second point was that it was disgraceful for the U.S. government to deport Demjanjuk -- on the grounds that he had falsified his immigration documents to hide his past in the Ukraine -- in the first place. Buchanan correctly noted that the U.S. government basically deported him for being a retired auto worker instead of a rocket scientist . . . since this same U.S. government had gone to great lengths in the past to do the exact same thing for various German scientists in the post-WW2 era to whitewash their Nazi ties so they could immigrate to the United States.

I can't say I disagree with Buchanan on either point here.

45 posted on 11/13/2008 9:20:09 AM PST by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson