Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrat takes lead in Alaska Senate race (Dems stealing AK, MN)
google ^ | 11/13/08 | Johnson

Posted on 11/13/2008 6:21:27 AM PST by pabianice

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — Just as Sen. Ted Stevens appeared ready to take his criminal record back to Congress — perhaps opening a door for Gov. Sarah Palin to replace him — his re-election bid faltered.

Democrat Mark Begich, who trailed Stevens by more than 3,200 votes to start the day Wednesday, jumped to an 814-vote lead as state officials resumed their count of early and absentee ballots. The tally late Wednesday was 132,196 to 131,382, with an estimated 30,000 ballots remaining to be counted, some on Friday and some next week.

"After watching the votes today, I remain cautiously optimistic," Begich, a two-term Anchorage mayor, said in a news release. "We ran an aggressive campaign, especially when it came to early voting and absentee."

(Excerpt) Read more at ap.google.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; acorn; senate2008; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: KriegerGeist
I liked the idea of online voting once upon a time, too, then I considered something. At this point in time, what sort of "proof" does conventional voting give that you voted for a specific candidate?

With online voting, there would be the "screen shot". With proof, now we have something that can be paid for. Makes it easy to buy and sell votes.

No thanks, not interested anymore.

41 posted on 11/13/2008 11:38:00 AM PST by hunter112 (Obamunism will fizzle, fo' shizzle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Pawtucket Patriot
We do have Republicans counting the votes too you know. Not every volunteer in this country is a liberal.

Wow. Really?
42 posted on 11/13/2008 12:15:59 PM PST by Eagle of Liberty (This nation must not die on our watch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
The PROBLEM is that all the newly found ballots are for the Dem and they are being "found" in the back seats of cars and in districts that are 98% Dem.

Isn't this what just happened in the MN Coleman/Frankenstein race? I thought one of the poll workers in a heavily RAT county "found" some ballots in the trunk of their car....Straight from the RAT playbook during Washington State 2004 Governors race.
43 posted on 11/13/2008 12:18:55 PM PST by copaliscrossing (If stupidity were barrels of oil, we should start drilling the liberals heads right now!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

“The PROBLEM is that all the newly found ballots are for the Dem and they are being “found” in the back seats of cars and in districts that are 98% Dem.”


Even if that were true, the Governor and the Lieutenant Governor of Alaska (who oversees elections) are both Republicans. It is their job to disqualify illegal and duplicate ballots.
There are no 98% Democrat precincts or districts in Alaska.


44 posted on 11/13/2008 12:43:38 PM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

At this point, I think it may actually be best if they get their 60 votes in the Senate so they can’t blame the Republicans for anything. It’s not like Specter, Snowe, Collins, and some of the other RINOs in there are going to use the filibuster to do anything important like block liberal judicial nominees, so will this really make any difference?


45 posted on 11/13/2008 3:17:10 PM PST by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hunter112
"With online voting, there would be the "screen shot". With proof, now we have something that can be paid for. Makes it easy to buy and sell votes."

I suppose that I'm not computer savvy enough to understand "screen shot" and buying and selling votes...

My point was concerning 'security' as it now is on-line with what I described in my reply.

I was trying to make a point that there must be a more secure way to register voters with a valid and secure "Voter ID" even if it requires a photo, signature and fingerprints and if you have to get it at the DMV or Post Office or Courthouse...

That Voter ID would be swiped like a credit card at a polling place that would allow one to vote, but then, there and nowhere else. I though that same card could be used on-line the same as in a bank transaction or credit card purchase... Does this mean that my on-line banking and credit card purchases have a "screen shot" "With proof, now they would know something can be paid for. Makes it easy to buy and sell..." What regarding my banking or purchases? My understanding here fails.

Bottom line though: NO reform is going to be made anyway. Am I wrong? Then, what about after 2000, 2004, 2006...this year? Voters don't want to have to produce valid ID, photo ID, nada...it's discriminatory, disenfranchisement...blah, blah, blah...therefore, judge or Sec. State rules none needed and there you go: FRAUD and it will continue. It's to the Democrats advantage to have have the dead, animals, illegals, criminals, homeless, Disney characters and Cowboys lineup to vote early and vote often.

46 posted on 11/13/2008 4:34:05 PM PST by KriegerGeist ("Cry 'Havoc' and let slip the dogs of War on Socialism")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Note that the Democrats come from behind late in all of these close races. They have to give them time to slip in all of the fraudulent ACORN votes. It happened in Oregon for Senator where they counted the biggest county last, as well as, in Minnesota, Alaska, Georgia and the Presidential race for Virginia. In the 2004 Governor’s race in Washington, they kept re-counting their biggest county until the Democrat had won.


47 posted on 11/13/2008 5:06:15 PM PST by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
Ummmm..., stole the election because they registered more Democrats and got more Democrats out to vote...?? LOL

Point # 1: More registered dims doesn't equate to more voting dims and

Point # 2: 38 votes in the trunk of a car leads me to believe one person may have voted 39 times.

ummmm...you're turn

48 posted on 11/13/2008 5:11:20 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: randita

DOn’t overlook a couple of other facts.

The DEMS dropped 5 Million in attack ads on Ted and Don. 5 Million for a state with a population smaller than Tucson Az (a nice place to be usre).

The DEMS sent some very high power ‘organizers’ up here so the yokels could do something right for a change.

THe (R) party was its own worst enemy.....


49 posted on 11/13/2008 7:13:05 PM PST by ASOC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Even if the Republicans retain a filibuster-effective minority, there are enough RINOs left in the Senate to give the Dems what they want. Just a little twist of the thumb screws and some buy-offs and they're good.

A RINO is so much worse than a Dem. At least a Dem won't sincerely call you their friend.

50 posted on 11/16/2008 9:23:12 AM PST by fwdude ("...a 'centrist' ... has few principles - and those are negotiable." - Don Feder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson