Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrat takes lead in Alaska Senate race (Dems stealing AK, MN)
google ^ | 11/13/08 | Johnson

Posted on 11/13/2008 6:21:27 AM PST by pabianice

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
It is statistically impossible for every single close race in which Republicans lead to switch to a Dem winner during lengthy counts and recounts. Any political activity by Republicans is useless until they can stamp-out this perpetual election theft by the Left.
1 posted on 11/13/2008 6:21:28 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pabianice

agreed. This is the time to make a stink of it too. There is too much on the line, and it will motivate a seriously depressed party.


2 posted on 11/13/2008 6:22:51 AM PST by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Gosh, if pubbies would do a better job of vetting their candidates, maybe we wouldn’t be electing crooks.


3 posted on 11/13/2008 6:24:20 AM PST by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

The way to stamp it out is to create a voter-card and then a live-online database (or even a “static one” which records this information for accumulation later on) which records that someone has voted already (with that card). That card can only be issued to voters who are qualified for the state that they are in and the address that they have.

That’s the way to eliminate this kind of fraud.


4 posted on 11/13/2008 6:24:59 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

They steal at will, while their constituents cheer them on. Democracy is dead. America is over.


5 posted on 11/13/2008 6:25:28 AM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
It is statistically impossible...

No, it's not.

It is quite unlikely, though.

6 posted on 11/13/2008 6:25:56 AM PST by TankerKC (I'm waiting for my government ration of hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Any political activity by Republicans is useless until they can stamp-out this perpetual election theft by the Left.

I agree. We have to win by a clear 5% or we lose to fraud. I may as well not vote anymore. I know of a person here in Texas who had to vote a provisional ballot because she was on record as having voted already. She had not voted, but someone in the Oak Cliff area (95% Obama country) had already voted under her name. So, basically, she did not really vote, as provisional ballots are never counted unless it is for dems.

7 posted on 11/13/2008 6:26:46 AM PST by Sans-Culotte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Begich: “We ran an aggressive campaign, especially when it came to early voting and absentee.”

Yesh, we know: “Vote early, AND VOTE OFTEN!”


8 posted on 11/13/2008 6:27:27 AM PST by mywholebodyisaweapon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

They had 80,000 votes to count after the election. Stevens needs to win this race.


9 posted on 11/13/2008 6:28:02 AM PST by scooby321 (Cai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

How about the purple dye on the finger trick


10 posted on 11/13/2008 6:28:19 AM PST by al baby (Hi mom Honkeys for Mc Cain Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
"We ran an aggressive campaign, especially when it came to early voting and absentee."

I find this statement troubling or perhaps telling within itself.
11 posted on 11/13/2008 6:28:33 AM PST by Notasoccermom (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

This makes me furious!


12 posted on 11/13/2008 6:28:55 AM PST by RDTF (BO smells and eventually people do what's necessary to avoid it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

You said — “It is statistically impossible for every single close race in which Republicans lead to switch to a Dem winner during lengthy counts and recounts.”

That wouldn’t necessarily be true — if — there was some inherent practices that distinguish the Republican voter from the Democrat voter.

For a very simple example (and only for illustrating the point and not saying that this is true...) — let’s say that all Republicans vote early and are done three hours before the poll close, while all Democrats are habitually late and end up standing in line all the way up to the end, at the point the polls close.

Then when the counts are made for *close races* — the Democrats would *always pull ahead* — because their votes are counted last, since they are *habitually late* and are the last ones to vote....

In that case, there would be nothing wrong, “statistically” when the Democrats always win the “close races”...

There could be some other factor that is similar to this, which makes it statistically possible (by voter habits or methodology of counting..., let’s say, always counting Metro areas last... for example...).


13 posted on 11/13/2008 6:30:55 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

I still don’t understand how absentee ballots can favor the ‘Rat in Alaska. They’re usually cast by military, elderly, and folks traveling out of state, aren’t they? What does Palin have to say about this, if anything?


14 posted on 11/13/2008 6:32:50 AM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby

You said — “How about the purple dye on the finger trick”

Yes, a very simplistic, but extremely effective methodology... LOL...


15 posted on 11/13/2008 6:35:43 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
It is unlikely but not impossible. Consider the distribution of voters is split approximately 38% dim 33% Republican and the rest not affiliated with those two party choices. It would be reasonable to expect to see the votes cast accordingly.

IMHO, the dims are stealing AK and MN because the "new votes" are disproportionally dim.

16 posted on 11/13/2008 6:37:31 AM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

I haven’t heard anything lately, but I imagine she has to walk a pretty fine line of wanting the GOP to win the seat and hoping for Stevens to either resign or get kicked out by the Senate. Then she can nominate a replacement.


17 posted on 11/13/2008 6:47:24 AM PST by mquinn (Obama's supporters: a deliberate drowning of consciousness by means of rhythmic noise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

it seems that it will now be impossible for a republican to win any dead heat races.


18 posted on 11/13/2008 6:49:42 AM PST by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Statitistilcally impossible for 2 races to switch? Better go back to statistics 101. Minnesota is the one to watch out for fraud, more so than Alaska, but the Republicans have no one to blame but themselves, for fielding a convicted felon and a RINO. I despise Franken, but Coleman is only marginally better. Georgia is going to be a warzone in the Chambliss/Martin run-off. Expect millions to be poured in, and Obama to possiblly grace the unwashed southern hordes with an in-person plea for Martin’s victory. Perhaps Joseph Lieberman possible caucus switch will be the only thing from preventing a 60 seat majority for the Dems. Get ready for the swift fury of fascism to come raining down, whilst the Federal Reserve continues to vacuum the country dry, and the police state applies itself with breath-taking force. I fear for the very concept of democratic popular sovereignty.


19 posted on 11/13/2008 6:53:28 AM PST by oioiman (The Federal Reserve has officially been listed as the USA's cause of death.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

Why wouldn’t their constituents cheer them on? WHERE ARE THE REPUBLICANS? WHERE ARE THE REPUBLICANS???


20 posted on 11/13/2008 6:55:38 AM PST by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson