Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pabianice
It is unlikely but not impossible. Consider the distribution of voters is split approximately 38% dim 33% Republican and the rest not affiliated with those two party choices. It would be reasonable to expect to see the votes cast accordingly.

IMHO, the dims are stealing AK and MN because the "new votes" are disproportionally dim.

16 posted on 11/13/2008 6:37:31 AM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pfflier

Election night it looked like Repubs might have had a reasonable 44 seats. I thought they could take back a majority by 2012, especially if Obama’s plans do not work out that well. But now forget it. If Chambliss manages to win and they come out of this with 41, it will be like that 1958-1980 period again. Republicans will probably not be able to take a majority for many cycles, if ever, thanks to changing demographics and Demo cheating.


22 posted on 11/13/2008 7:01:23 AM PST by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: pfflier

You said — “IMHO, the dims are stealing AK and MN because the “new votes” are disproportionally dim.”

Ummmm..., stole the election because they registered more Democrats and got more Democrats out to vote...?? LOL...

This must be the “Fairness Doctrine” applied by the Republicans to the issue of “voter parity”.... :-)


30 posted on 11/13/2008 7:10:55 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson