Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: purplelobster

Hope the judge fines him for making a frivolous lawsuit. What an idiot. They got the same name, but for completely different reasons (one named after the Bati Raman mountains, the other a combination of the words “bat” and “man”, hence the insignia and costume). That and their town didn’t become anything more then a village til the 50’s, whereas the Batman character has been around since 1939. 10-to-1 this guy’s the one and only person on the entire planet who’s never heard of Batman, so it’s a complete shock to him to see a character in a movie called Batman. But even so, you gotta be a flaming idiot to think that that name has anything at all to do with his town. He’s called Batman because he’s a man who dresses as a bat. He isn’t related to Turkey, the Turkish city of Batman, the Bati Raman Mountains, or anything of the sort.


8 posted on 11/11/2008 7:20:15 PM PST by Optimus Prime (Do liberals even qualify as sentient beings?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Optimus Prime

There’s a family in my community with the last name of Batman. Wonder if this guy will sue them, as well?


13 posted on 11/11/2008 7:23:27 PM PST by TXBlair ( Fort Hood LOVES its vets!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Optimus Prime

I think that settles that. One question, since Batman the comic has been around since 1939, should WB counter-sue the city for copyright infringement?


23 posted on 11/11/2008 8:20:58 PM PST by messierhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson