Posted on 11/11/2008 4:26:40 PM PST by Ronzo
The current financial crisis has revived powerful misconceptions about the Great Depression. Those who misinterpret the past are all too likely to repeat the exact same mistakes that made the Great Depression so deep and devastating.
Here are five interrelated and durable myths about the 1929-39 Depression:
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
Good article but it really needed to explain—when debunking the crash misconception—about the enormous monetary contraction, which is what actually destroyed the economy (while New Deal policies prolonged the depression).
While the "greed" card gets overplayed by liberals, it most certainly DOES play its part in the expanding bubbles such as the one in real estate, whether it's mortgage brokers trying to make a deal or would-be real estate magnates trying to "flip houses".
And slapping around tariffs is mere boilerplate for free market ideologues everywhere.
this was a most excellent article.
thanks.
The latest King of the Sandbox in the tradition of Lenin, Stalin, Mussolini, Hitler, Mao.
The market will right itself when enough with a stake eject the Spoiler.
BOOKMARK.
Great post. Thanks.
If you want tougher sledding, but absolutely eye-opening new interpretations on every page, here are two:
Adam Tooze, "The Wages of Destruction," about the economy of Nazi Germany. He blows away almost every preconceived notion we ever had about Hitler's "miracle" economy, Speer's "production miracle," and the relationship between Jew-murder and production in the Reich; and
Tony Judt, "Postwar." This is a fabulous (long) history of post-war Europe. He hates Bush, but strangely enough stumbles into most of the right conclusions anyway. His take on the fall of the Soviets is good (not heavy enough on Reagan, but after all, it is about Europe). He hates Thatcher, but once you get past that, it's really an informative, dense book.
Again? According to the author they weren't learned the first time. He points out that Hoover and FDR employed propagandists to deliberately hide those lessons from the public.
Yes, they were and they are available to be read in history books. Unfortunately we pick and choose which historians we listen to rather than listen to the obviously correct Conservative or unbiased.
bookmark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.