Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/11/2008 9:51:12 AM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SmithL

Blacks voted against the gays. Irony is priceless.


2 posted on 11/11/2008 9:51:57 AM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Prop 8 will be overturned. And if it isn’t, we’ll see a Hollywood onslaught that shames the population into doing their bidding.

What a sick nation we have.


4 posted on 11/11/2008 9:56:56 AM PST by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
I can't wait for the ACLU to tell a nearly all white California Supreme Court that California voters were all white bigoted redneck homophobes.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

5 posted on 11/11/2008 9:57:44 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

so what’s their excuse for the other 2 times gay marriage type proposals were defeated. there was no obama on the ballot then.


6 posted on 11/11/2008 9:59:57 AM PST by sappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
The irony is that the wording of Prop 8 was deliberately changed to guarantee its defeat.

Here's the story:

Prop. 8 asks voters to affirm that "only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California" - a concept that voters overwhelmingly backed when they approved Proposition 22 in 2000.

Voters still favor the traditional definition of marriage, 49 to 47 percent, according to the most recent Public Policy Institute of California poll.

However, in the wake of the state Supreme Court decision in May legalizing same-sex marriage, Brown worded Prop. 8's ballot description to specify that it "eliminates the right of same-sex couples to marry."

The proponents' original title for Prop. 8 was "Limit on Marriage." What voters see on their ballot pamphlet, thanks to Brown, is, "Eliminates Right of Same-Sex Couples to Marry."

Prop. 8 supporters accused Brown of playing politics and went to court.

They lost. The new language went on the ballot, and pollsters said support for the ban dropped by eight points - with the most recent PPIC survey showing 52 percent of likely voters now opposing the ban.

"It all depends on how you ask the question," said Sacramento pollster Jim Moore of J. Moore Methods.

"When you ask people what they believe, you get one answer," he said. "But when you ask someone to take away something from somebody else, it seems unfair."

Field Institute pollster Mark DiCamillo agreed, noting that when his outfit tested the two wordings in September, support for Prop. 8 was three points lower on Brown's version than the original.

As the state's top law enforcer, Brown has taken no official position on Prop. 8.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/10/26/BADT13NUOH.DTL

7 posted on 11/11/2008 10:00:22 AM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Whats funny is that according to Rush the week before the election, The Zero was still running ads in CA in attempt to pad his national numbers and lift congressional candidates. If he had ignored CA it might have failed.


8 posted on 11/11/2008 10:00:40 AM PST by jbwbubba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
So so funny. I wonder if the Hollywood homos are going to retaliate by going back to portraying blacks with the buggy eyes etc. like they used in the movies.
9 posted on 11/11/2008 10:01:04 AM PST by GinaLolaB (=^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Did anyone else notice the disconnect between the public’s stance on issues and whom they ended up voting for in this election?

This is a great example—most blacks (in CA, at least) are against gay marriage, but they voted for Obama, who is in favor of it.

On the whole, most Americans are against illegal immigration and for domestic drilling, but their Presidential choice is at odds with them on both issues.

I suspect the list could go on . . .


16 posted on 11/11/2008 10:19:29 AM PST by rightwingintelligentsia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

“Ironically, however, a mathematical analysis of voting and exit poll data indicates very strongly that it was exactly that pro-Obama surge that spelled victory for Proposition 8.”

Are you listening Ellen Degeneres?


18 posted on 11/11/2008 10:22:08 AM PST by AuntB (The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

The militant homosexual lobby has so artfully hijacked the rhetoric of genuine civil rights. That rhetoric has been cynically misapplied to the homosexual agenda, which includes mandated moral relativism, social androgyny and not just full acceptance, but celebration of a pleasure-based, sexually deviant lifestyle.

If you can maintain control of undeveloped and impressionable youth and spoon-feed them misinformation, lies and half-truths about dangerous, disordered and extremely risky behaviors, then you can control the future and ensure that those behaviors are not only fully accepted, but celebrated

Freedom of speech must never be suppressed, except for criticism directed at minorities, non-Christian religions, homosexuals, communists, illegal aliens, and other constituencies of the Democrat party.


19 posted on 11/11/2008 10:34:55 AM PST by Ouderkirk (Freedom of speech must never be suppressed, except for criticism directed at constituencies of the D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

We still suffer from the same 1960’s juvenile petulance when the powers that be did not immediately fall in line as protesters demanded.


20 posted on 11/11/2008 10:37:55 AM PST by Ouderkirk (I believe that criminals, like communists, are on their best behavior when they are afraid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL
Pat myself on the back- 11/5/08 Post #115
23 posted on 11/11/2008 11:05:21 AM PST by paltz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Homosexual activists resorted to using the heavy-handed and rather lowbrow tactic of trying to hijack and redefine an English word, “marriage”, simply because they feel a sociopathic need to “stick it” to normal, traditional Americans.

The sodomites and lesbians were not satisfied to mind their own business and graciously accept the “civil union” as their gift from liberal state legislatures. No. They needed an ongoing “culture war” to constantly feed their childish martyrdom complex and the “civil union” language didn’t cause the uproar and the outrage they had hoped for. They had to find a new way to really get under the skin of the “breeders”.

Ahh.... let’s demand “marriage”. That’ll frost ‘em!

Personally, I never gave a rat’s behind what the sodomites did to each other in the privacy of their own hot tubs, but now I want them to lose on every issue that is of importance to them because it was they, not me, who declared war. To hell with them all.


29 posted on 11/11/2008 2:45:43 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

When Proposition 8’s passage first became apparent, it was widely assumed that hundreds of thousands of first-time or occasional voters had turned out to vote for Obama, then left the rest of their ballots blank, thus allowing more conservative voters to dominate ballot measures.


Well, that’s just too flippin’ bad isn’t it!!!

Stoopid is as stoopid does...


30 posted on 11/11/2008 4:00:07 PM PST by stevie_d_64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson