Posted on 11/11/2008 4:46:08 AM PST by tobyhill
Reporting from Washington -- Four leading advocacy groups representing business, labor and retirees are starting a campaign today to press Barack Obama to enact comprehensive healthcare reform, upping the pressure on the president-elect to tackle the issue quickly after he takes office.
In a letter to Obama, the Business Roundtable, the National Federation of Independent Businesses, AARP and the Service Employees International Union urge that a healthcare overhaul be a priority in the administration's first 100 days.
The groups plan to spend nearly $1 million to publicize their cause in newspaper and television advertising in coming weeks.
"What we are doing is reminding not just the president but the Congress as well that . . . this remains one of the most important issues facing the country," said Business Roundtable President John Castellani. "We need to now follow through."
In their letter, the groups link healthcare reform with the nation's bleak economic conditions.
"Addressing skyrocketing healthcare costs is a critical component of stabilizing household, national and global economies," the letter said. "Inaction undermines the economic security of our families; limits the productivity of our workforce; stagnates job creation and wage growth; and threatens to crowd out investments in energy, education and infrastructure."
Obama made healthcare reform a central plank of his presidential campaign, pledging a sweeping effort to expand coverage and lower costs.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
I’ve never understood how making someone else pay for your health care is supposed to lower the cost of health care. It would seem to me it does exactly the opposite.
These people aren’t going to like what the future is going to hold for them—the whole medical infrastructure is going to come crashing down
It’s a combination of greed, economic illiteracy, desire for the spotlight, and a misguided belief that government knows better what is good for your family than you do.
$$$$$$$$ beckons
Yea, and giving away healthcare will really make it better.
Obama has a pack circling and guess where he plans on getting jelly beans?
“(Obama sold his soul to special interest groups)”
WHAT soul???
They are gone, voted out of office by welfare leeches.
When the birds get to vote on the need to keep the feeder full, you will go bankrupt putting in enough seed to satisfy all that will show up.
“The groups plan to spend nearly $1 million to publicize their cause in newspaper and television advertising in coming weeks. “
That 1 million would have paid for a lot of medical bills.
I agree. People pay thousands to keep their cars running without so much as a peep. Yet, when it comes to the up keep of their bodies, they want someone else to pay for it.
What happened to the endless Dem squawking about how we were burdening the future, THE CHILDREN, with this massive deficit and how Bush had squandered some Clinton surplus and he needed to stop spending irresponsibly?
“I’ve never understood how making someone else pay for your health care is supposed to lower the cost of health care. It would seem to me it does exactly the opposite”
The real problem is that the parties determining the cost and extent of medical treatment, the doctor and patient, have little regard for the cost of the treatment. The parties that pays for the treatment, government sources and insurance, have little control over the cost of the treatment. Costs can not be controlled until the party paying for the services determine the services. The best treatment will be if the patient has a significant financial stake in the treatment rendered, the worse case (think socialized medicine) is that a third party (the government) determines treatment and cost.
Here is a link to the position paper written by Hillary and the big O.
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/354/21/2205
“We have visited doctors and hospitals throughout the country and heard firsthand from those who face ever-escalating insurance costs. Indeed, in some specialties, high premiums are forcing physicians to give up performing certain high-risk procedures, leaving patients without access to a full range of medical services. But we have also talked with families who have experienced errors in their care, and it has become clear to us that if we are to find a fair and equitable solution to this complex problem, all parties physicians, hospitals, insurers, and patients must work together. Instead of focusing on the few areas of intense disagreement, such as the possibility of mandating caps on the financial damages awarded to patients, we believe that the discussion should center on a more fundamental issue: the need to improve patient safety.”
Also, some prices just make no sense. A few years ago I had a minor medical problem that required some tests and treatment. The test used a multithousand (I guess) piece of equipment, many minutes of the doctor's time and was more invasive. List price was $99. The treatment required one simple medical tool and maybe 30 seconds of the doctor's time, but listed at over $300 because it was officially "surgery" rather than a "test". Other than malpractice liability, I can think of no reason why the treatments cost more than the tests.
Last night, a mom told of trying to force health care companies to provide certain services for children with autism.
As a grandmother with a child with autism, I do not automatically believe that it is a given that the more care the better.
Someone has to pay.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.