Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SECURE AMERICA
I believe the U. S. Constitution prohibits the presence of an active "Standing army..." within the borders of the United States of America; one of the problems Lincoln wrestled with in the mid-to-late 1860's, which I believe he negotiated successfully by declaring Martial Law and a national State of Emergency.

The more astute constitutional scholars than I really should weigh in here though, as I am guessing from what little I remember from high school history & civics.

;-/

13 posted on 11/11/2008 3:44:44 AM PST by Gargantua ("...but Daddy... I don't want to go to Madrassas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Gargantua
"I believe the U. S. Constitution prohibits the presence of an active "Standing army..." within the borders of the United States of America; one of the problems Lincoln wrestled with in the mid-to-late 1860's, which I believe he negotiated successfully by declaring Martial Law and a national State of Emergency."

Actually, you are correct. There is no provision within the Constitution for an army - for a Navy, yes.

However, within our nation's last hundred years or so, it became apparent we needed such. So, we need a Constitutional Amendment to change that.

In this day of hi-tech weaponry and smaller world, the US cannot rely on a civilian Militia to counter our enemies, as much as some dream we should.

18 posted on 11/11/2008 3:56:08 AM PST by A Navy Vet (In perpetuum sacramentum : An Oath is Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson