To: BlueStateBlues
Barr took votes but so didn’t Nader.
2 posted on
11/10/2008 12:34:21 PM PST by
misterrob
(Smooth talkers win at singles bars and in politics .. often with similar outcomes for the listener)
To: misterrob; BlueStateBlues
Barr took votes but so didn’t Nader. Sure, but in the above two states, Barr plus McCain would be above 50%.
I suspect that in the states where Nader kept Obama under 50%, Obama won anyway...
7 posted on
11/10/2008 12:36:34 PM PST by
PhatHead
To: misterrob
Nader wasn’t on the ballot in NC
19 posted on
11/10/2008 12:43:16 PM PST by
jbwbubba
To: misterrob
Nader wasn’t on the ballot here in NC; all we had were Obama, McCain, and Barr. No Nader, no Baldwin. It is extremely hard for a third-party candidate to get on the ballot in North Carolina.
}:-)4
25 posted on
11/10/2008 12:46:16 PM PST by
Moose4
(Hey RNC. Don't move toward the middle. MOVE THE MIDDLE TOWARD YOU.)
To: misterrob
Barr took votes but so didn’t Nader.Nitpicking English, but it makes a big differentce in what you are trying to say.
27 posted on
11/10/2008 12:46:38 PM PST by
Travis T. OJustice
(Change is not a destination, just as hope is not a strategy.)
To: misterrob
|
"Barr took votes but so didn’t Nader." Any chance you're in Medford (Mefid) Mass? Norwood?
|
|
|
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson