Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama FCC transition team to push media/telecom diversity
Ars Technica ^ | November 09, 2008 - 05:30PM CT | Matthew Lasar

Posted on 11/09/2008 6:44:09 PM PST by newzjunkey

Reports about the man that President-elect Barack Obama is expected to choose to manage the transition at the Federal Communications Commission emphasize his past role as a lobbyist and FCC Commissioner. But the truth is that Henry Rivera has never really left the FCC, having stayed active in its matrix of advisory groups from the 1980s right up to the present. And Rivera's agenda is no secret: figuring out ways to help minorities get a bigger slice of the telecommunications and broadcast media pie.

In fact, as Chair of the Commission's Advisory Committee on Diversity for Communications in the Digital Age, Rivera just sent the agency a set of recommendations on how to further this goal. It suggests three ways to enhance "the ability of minorities and women to participate in telecommunications and related industries."

Dated October 28, the report may be a preview of a major aspect of the Obama FCC agenda.

Social disadvantages

The challenge for regulators who want to make it easier for women and minorities to own more telecom licenses and businesses is how to create programs that don't run afoul of judicial hostility to diversity plans. One of the reforms that various groups have been lobbying for is a "socially and economically disadvantaged businesses" (SDB) classification, in which minority-led "eligible entities" would receive various preferences and breaks during media sales and spectrum auctions, among other transactions.

The FCC has been dropping the ball on this idea for years; it keeps coming up and disappearing in proceedings. Kevin Martin's FCC has been skittish about it too. In an Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking approved in December, the Commission extended various Small Business Administration style breaks to smaller telecom firms. But the NOPR cited various "race conscious" government minority business programs that have been struck down by the courts. The Order asked for feedback on how the SDB classification could be "narrowly tailored" to protect it from legal smackdowns.

Rivera's list of recommendations favors the SDB idea, but appears to concede that research work needs to be done to to put the program on a solid legal foundation. So the Committee suggests that, until a definition is worked out, the FCC should opt for a "full file review" approach to minority businesses support programs. The full file approach takes a "race neutral" approach to applicants, but takes note of hurdles that a business owner has overcome. The Commission's NOPR mentions some hypothetical examples of potentially successful full file review applicants:

"an applicant injured in military service in Iraq who later completed a leadership training program; a rural applicant who put herself through college and successfully ran a previously-bankrupt AM station; and a Spanish language radio company owner who succeeded despite advertiser resistance to program language and format"

Rivera's document strongly endorses this concept. "Because of its race-neutrality, an FFR-based program can be implemented in the short-term," the Advisory Committee writes. The Committee also wants the FCC to fast track breaks on fees and waivers for minority media and telecom business owners as, percentage-wise, these take a larger financial bite out of smaller operations than big outfits. But the group's letter saves its most far reaching recommendation for last.

S is for station

The Advisory Committee strongly endorses an idea, proposed by Andrew Schwartzman of the Media Access Project (MAP) at the FCC's En Banc July hearing, that would boost minority media ownership. MAP urges the creation of a new category of television station—Class S. These "Class S" station owners would be able to lease one of the new multiplex subchannels from a full-power commercial digital TV license.

MAP's proposed Class S arrangement would extend to businesses in the SDB group, however that is eventually defined. These licensees would not be allowed to broadcast commercial fare for more than half their schedule. And, if the full power license owner wants to broadcast in high definition, the Class S broadcaster would have to lease some of its spectrum back for that purpose, although not more than six hours per day.

The MAP plan is pretty close to one proposed by Rivera's Advisory Committee in 2007, which would extend the concept to FM stations, too. Rivera's letter suggests that the DTV/subchannel sharing structure is similar to the relationship between the owner of a condominium building and its unit owners. "The DTV sub-channel or HD channel licensee would control its channel’s content, while its engineering would continue to be handled by the DTV or FM station licensee for a fee," it concludes.

Henry Rivera has been working on these sort of issues for a very long time. He is so linked to this issue that, in 2002, when Michael Powell's FCC held its own hearing on minority ownership questions, it summoned him to review the agency's efforts in this regard. Rivera started his history with the United Church of Christ's 1967 petition to get the FCC to prohibit employment discrimination in radio and television.

The UCC, of course, is the Church with which Barack Obama has been associated since the mid-1980s, although he quit his local chapter during the presidential campaign.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bho2008; diversity; fcc; henryrivera; quotas; rivera
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
These plans do nothing to address the real challenges for the FCC on broadband, on content, on competition and consumer pricing.

Notice how conscious they are about crafting a "diversity" policy which will slip through the loopholes in the courts' opposition to quotas and such affirmative action efforts.

1 posted on 11/09/2008 6:44:10 PM PST by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Oh, please! Diversity in color has been here and done that...We don’t want his type of diversity in promoting communism...


2 posted on 11/09/2008 6:46:27 PM PST by hope (the socialist msm result is mind-numb O-bots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Prepare for Democrat cronyism, assaults on the first amendment and major parts of the economy the likes of which no one has ever seen.


3 posted on 11/09/2008 6:47:30 PM PST by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Everything this administration wants to do will be one more feather plucked from the eagle that laid the golden eggs...until she dies.


4 posted on 11/09/2008 6:49:42 PM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dr_who

Is it any wonder there is a literal run on gun and ammo shops all across the fruited plain??


5 posted on 11/09/2008 6:49:46 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo (Look at the bright side. The Mass Media will FINALLY report nice & praising stories of the military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hope

Diversity is a word that means different things. Does he mean diversity on the public airwaves? Diversity as in the fairness doctrine, which will attempt to have liberal equal time?????

Do the Democrats/liberals/radicals care that Air America couldn’t compete on talk radio?

Air America was formed in 2004 with the express purpose of defeating George W. Bush for re-election. They hoped to create popular shows and make their liberal hosts as popular as Rush and Sean Hannity.

If it didn’t work, if the free market didn’t support Air America programming, why should it have to be subsidized by the gov’t?????

Is anyone going to listen to Air America if they force equal time for liberal shows? What are the Arbitron ratings for NPR radio stations in most cities, compared to the conservative talk stations??????


6 posted on 11/09/2008 6:50:09 PM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hope

They are going to use the FCC to attack the remaining bits of the media that won’t toe the party line and protect allies from competition. Forget about innovation. This is a power play.


7 posted on 11/09/2008 6:50:32 PM PST by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
The most powerful person in media today is a black woman. I'd say that as far as diversity in the media is concerned, it's "Mission Accomplished."


8 posted on 11/09/2008 6:51:26 PM PST by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Great news! Rush Limbaugh to be replaced by the Rev Jeremiah Wright! OOOaahh! Not God bless America, God D@#% America!! Ain’t we got fun?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAYe7MT5BxM


9 posted on 11/09/2008 6:51:29 PM PST by Jim Robinson (We ARE the dissent, baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

What do you all think people like Franken will be doing if he doesn’t steal the senatorial election?


10 posted on 11/09/2008 6:52:10 PM PST by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

who will be the federally orderd counter to Oprah?

what will be the federally ordered counter to CNN, FNC, MSNBC?


11 posted on 11/09/2008 6:54:12 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Barf!...Don’t stare into that for too long.


12 posted on 11/09/2008 6:55:32 PM PST by hope (the socialist msm result is mind-numb O-bots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
"Diversity is a word that means different things. Does he mean diversity on the public airwaves? Diversity as in the fairness doctrine, which will attempt to have liberal equal time?????"

Of course!

13 posted on 11/09/2008 6:57:29 PM PST by hope (the socialist msm result is mind-numb O-bots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
If Premier Obama cannot directly enact the Fairness Doctrine, he will attempt incremental steps via non-legislative, judicial maneuvers in order o create the same effective result. This is how the “criminal mind” operates.
14 posted on 11/09/2008 6:58:46 PM PST by Chairman of the Bard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

That’s a puzzler - how do we sell things only to “people of color” and not be called “racists”? Hm...

Oh I know - how about we install a bunch of left wing activist judges who’ll let us do anything we want? :D


15 posted on 11/09/2008 7:05:50 PM PST by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Obama for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

End result - 10 Rap/HipHop AM stations per market.


16 posted on 11/09/2008 7:12:20 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Vote Obama: Get more stuff!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce

Command and control economy. The sheeple have bought into
this crap.


17 posted on 11/09/2008 7:15:18 PM PST by ChiMark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: hope

my eyes are bleeding


18 posted on 11/09/2008 8:13:00 PM PST by OL Hickory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

“.....”socially and economically disadvantaged businesses” (SDB) classification, in which minority-led “eligible entities” would receive various preferences and breaks during media sales and spectrum auctions, among other transactions.”

The excerpt above along with more in the article lead me to believe that there is to become some auctionable communications entities during Obama’s tenure as President.

Suggests to me the targeted demise of Conservative talk radio, and Affirmative Actioneers to become the beneficiaries of Obama mandated Auctioneers.


19 posted on 11/09/2008 8:24:48 PM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, Call 'em what you will, they ALL have Fairies livin' in their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

This was the guy who kept the “Fairness Doctrine” in place until he was replaced with a new commissioner by President Reagan.

Rivera is a hardcore partisan who will fight to re-establish the “fairness doctrine.”


20 posted on 11/09/2008 8:29:38 PM PST by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson