The terrorist will attempt to do the most damage with the weapons they have that means large cities. Large cities means large liberal cities.
liberals are the primary target for the terrorist, so why argue with them?
That certainly does pose a dilemna for the terrorists, doesn't it?
Doesn’t judgment usually happen on the large cities?
Because some of us happen to live in or near large cities?
most liberals live in the cities
the cities are the targets
liberals vote for a man who will not protect them
it says it all about the dumb arses but it also speaks volumes about how the media are stuck on ignorant and stupid.
lets not forget all of our enemies have endorsed obama or said congratulations while on the other hand Britain are best ally who lost many men and women helping us in this war, France whose leader said that he thought obama was immature and Italy .
all allies have all not been happy with obama winning
yep speaks volumes so when the liberals cry about them wanting the world to like them then they must have meant our enemies as this is what has happened
Since the liberals bailed out on the war on terror, and the liberal bastion of New York was the target, I wonder if it may be difficult to rally the nation if a liberal bastion is hit again.
What the hell are you asking?
“”I am thinking I am getting cynical but if the left doesn’t want to fight the war on terror why should we argue with them?
The terrorist will attempt to do the most damage with the weapons they have that means large cities. Large cities means large liberal cities.
liberals are the primary target for the terrorist, so why argue with them?””
LOL, I could use another 50 miles between my house and New York City....