Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Issaquahking
Hey troll, You and your attitude can't even recognize a conservative. I had the privilege of working as a volunteer on her campaign for a while.

I'm a 'troll'? Palin *lost*. If she was the right candidate, she would NOT have lost. If she lost, then ergo - she was the wrong choice.
47 posted on 11/09/2008 11:01:34 AM PST by Weaver95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Weaver95

“Palin *lost*. If she was the right candidate, she would NOT have lost. If she lost, then ergo - she was the wrong choice.”

Good greif! That’s some clever dot connecting! Trying to drag the old RINO over the finish line made it impossible. McCain LOST. Palin won.

“Ninety-one percent (91%) of Republicans have a favorable view of Palin, including 65% who say their view is Very Favorable. Only eight percent (8%) have an unfavorable view of her, including three percent (3%) Very Unfavorable.

When asked to choose among some of the GOP’s top names for their choice for the party’s 2012 presidential nominee, 64% say Palin. The next closest contenders are two former governors and unsuccessful challengers for the presidential nomination this year — Mike Huckabee of Arkansas with 12% support and Mitt Romney of Massachusetts with 11%. “

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2127910/posts


51 posted on 11/09/2008 11:05:01 AM PST by AuntB (The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Weaver95
Flipping through you commentaries, yes I think your a troll to what FR is about. Palin wasn't on the lead of the ticket. Sarah was willing to fight tooth and nail, but she had to reespect who was the lead on the ticket. She did everything she could to make John McCain look good. She worked with eveything she had. Looking forward to seeing her back for a run for president.

Your 101 logic is childishly simple.
60 posted on 11/09/2008 11:13:34 AM PST by Issaquahking (This is the kind of person our forefathers wanted to run the country!!! Go Sarah Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Weaver95
Palin *lost*. If she was the right candidate, she would NOT have lost. If she lost, then ergo - she was the wrong choice.

Just curious; historically, how many Presidents have been elected so that their running mate would be Vice President?

131 posted on 11/09/2008 2:10:50 PM PST by Yossarrian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Weaver95
I'm a 'troll'? Palin *lost*. If she was the right candidate, she would NOT have lost. If she lost, then ergo - she was the wrong choice.

McCain was polling below 30% before he selected McCain. With any of the other choices on his short list, he was still polling below 30%.

Without Palin, he would have lost all 50 states.

Without McCain dragging down the ticket, Palin probably would have won.

134 posted on 11/09/2008 2:30:04 PM PST by meadsjn (Socialists promote neighbors selling out their neighbors; Free Traitors promote just the opposite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson