Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: verity
What you are saying is that the conservative base, unless their passion is excited, will allow a liberal Dem to be elected. And the second part of your proposition suggests that a liberal would vote for other than a liberal Dem [i.e. a conservative].

To win, you have to get the base enthused enough to donate money, time, and energy in support of the candidate. Say what you want about Obama, he had the ability to get lots of people enthusiastically pulling for him.

A liberal-moderate will vote liberal rather than conservative-moderate. We saw that in this election.

120 posted on 11/09/2008 12:59:10 PM PST by PapaBear3625 ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625

I think I see your point now. Nevertheless, I have a different set of convictions wherein the greater of two evils must not allowed to rise to power. IMHO, to do otherwise is abetment.


143 posted on 11/09/2008 3:03:21 PM PST by verity ("Lord, what fools we mortals be!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson