Posted on 11/09/2008 12:45:16 AM PST by Tailgunner Joe
Barack Obama has made no commitment that a missile defense shield in eastern Europe will go ahead, an advisor to the president-elect said Saturday, in apparent contradiction of statements by Poland.
Earlier, a statement from Polish President Lech Kaczynski after the two men spoke by telephone said Obama had said he would go ahead with plans to build a missile defense shield in eastern Europe despite threats from Russia.
But Obama had given no such clear cut undertaking on the controversial program, his senior foreign policy advisor Denis McDonough said in a statement.
(The) "president-elect had a good conversation with the Polish President and the Polish Prime Minister about the important US-Poland alliance," McDonough said in a statement.
"President Kaczynski raised missile defense but President-elect Obama made no commitment on it.
"His position is as it was throughout the campaign, that he supports deploying a missile defense system when the technology is proved to be workable."
The statement by President Kaczynski appeared to put a different spin on the conversation between the two men.
"Barack Obama has underlined the importance of the strategic partnership between Poland and the United States, he expressed his hope of continuing the political and military cooperation between our two countries," the statement read.
"He also said the anti-missile shield project would go ahead," said a statement said.
Warsaw and Washington signed a deal on August 14 to base part of a US missile shield in Poland, despite Moscow's opposition and mounting East-West tensions over Georgia.
The United States wants to base 10 interceptor missiles in Poland plus a radar facility in the neighboring Czech Republic by 2011-2013 to complete a system already in place in the United States, Greenland and Britain.
Washington says the shield -- endorsed by NATO in February -- is aimed at fending off potential attacks by so-called "rogue states" such as Iran, and is in no way aimed at Russia.
The United States warns that Iran could develop long-range missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads by 2015-2017.
The plan has enraged Moscow and the Kremlin has threatened to aim its own missiles at the planned US installations.
Just hours after Obama's historic election victory on Tuesday, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said Moscow would station short-range missile systems in its Kaliningrad enclave wedged between Poland and fellow EU member Lithuania.
US negotiator John Rood said Thursday that Washington had given Russia fresh proposals to try to ease its concerns and hoped the row could still be resolved.
He said the offer was sent "earlier this week," before Medvedev announced his plans to deploy missiles in Kaliningrad.
Medvedev's remarks on Wednesday amounted to a warning shot to Obama and Washington's allies in central Europe.
The European Union and NATO also expressed strong concern over Russia's decision to deploy missiles on the EU's doorstep.
Polish lawmakers have yet to ratify the US missile defense deal while the Czech government has called for a delay in a final vote on its radar agreements until the inauguration of President George W. Bush's successor in January.
A Kremlin spokesman says the two leaders agreed on a prompt meeting during a phone call Saturday.
A statement from the Kremlin says both sides agree Russian-U.S. relations should be a priority. It also says international stability requires "constructive and positive" relations between the two countries.
I bet the Russians and Iranians are frakking thrilled.
“His position is as it was throughout the campaign, that he supports deploying a missile defense system when the technology is proved to be workable.”
They’ve been proven, Obama.
Every day more delusion-jarring reality sinks in for the Messiah.
Guess he was too busy campaigning to notice the successful Navy missile intercept in the South Pacific a few months ago. Granted that’s not exactly the same as the so-called land-based missile shield, but it’s related technology. If Russia doesn’t want to fire any nukes at anyone, why does a shield bother them anyway?
Obama's verbal word isn't worth the paper it's written on.
LOL!!! President Obama is voting “PRESENT” again.
I worry that neophyte Obama will show himself in body language and choice of speech (translated) that he is the weaker of the two in serious psy-ops style negotiations. Other countries like Russia would smell this in a flash and would simply pwn him.
Frankly, the more I think about this, I would not want anyone this inexperienced in any head-to-head meetings with controversial foreign heads of state.
Do you hear that laughter? Do you? Our enemies are laughing at us for electing Obama.
Obama could send Plugs in his place.
The chekist hyenas in the kremlin are cackling with psychopathic delight.
Obama can't say anything about anything yet, because he's not the usurper.. err.. president yet (and never will be until he produces a non-forged, legitimate birth certificate).
He's being played, and he doesn't even know it. Meeting without the power of the presidency, or the full blessings of it, can only bring loss, never gain. He'll be exposed as weak and ineffective, rather than the leverage he would have with his full Constitutional powers.
If you're weak, you let your enemies try to find your weakness; you never give it away. He should be quiet, let the actual president lead for now, and wait to assume the presidency before acting like one.
That they are! That they are!
There you go, capital idea.
Bring some "gravitas" to the table.
That'll work.
All the turmoil; and he only adds to it. Of course. . .
How else could it go? He's a fool for even entertaining the thought.
Now THAT negotiation would go really well, wouldn't it? "Mister President, I'm back! I had to give away one or two little countries, but other than that, it really went well."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.