Replies

Remember how we were all assured that the gay groups all respect religious institutions, and that they would never, ever try to force religions to perform same-sex marriages....

Another of their favorite whines is, "How is my gay marriage going to harm your traditional marriage?" Then they proceed to indoctrinate children into homosexual practices and claim they are being discriminated against if they can't teach perversions in the classrooms. Not even to mention gay adoption. Whereas to heterosexuals and Christians, the entire purpose of marriage revolves around having children, being sexually decent and private, raising your children to feel secure with a mother and a father, and passing on those values by example to your children and grandchildren. That is marriage to us -- it's cradle-to-grave family life of blood relatives (except in the case of childless heterosexual couples who can still provide a mother and a father for an adoptee).

GBLT activists wanted their fight to be political starting in the 60s; now they think it's somehow unfair when they fail to convince people of their cause and people vote them down. They won't compromise over their aggressions towards children. Oh, wait -- it's not political! It's a civil right!

Make up your mind. If they have the civil right to raise their children as they see fit, why don't religious people have the same right? They want to do their thing, and we don't want our children indoctrinated into their sexual cult on the taxpayer dime.

Another of their favorite whines is, "How is my gay marriage going to harm your traditional marriage?" Then they proceed to indoctrinate children into homosexual practices and claim they are being discriminated against if they can't teach perversions in the classrooms. Not even to mention gay adoption. Whereas to heterosexuals and Christians, the entire purpose of marriage revolves around having children, being sexually decent and private, raising your children to feel secure with a mother and a father, and passing on those values by example to your children and grandchildren. That is marriage to us -- it's cradle-to-grave family life of blood relatives (except in the case of childless heterosexual couples who can still provide a mother and a father for an adoptee).

Gays are so self centered and cuckoo they think they can repeal 5000+ years of Judeo-Christian civilization
Judaism was a reaction to the rampant paganism of the day.
Pagans did all kinds of bizarre sexual things and gay marriage was common with some pagan cults

Another of their favorite whines is, "How is my gay marriage going to harm your traditional marriage?" Then they proceed to indoctrinate children into homosexual practices and claim they are being discriminated against if they can't teach perversions in the classrooms. Not even to mention gay adoption.

Exactly the way it is here in Massachusetts. No sooner was "gay marriage" imposed on us by judicial fiat (we never even got a chance to vote on the issue) than the peddlers of the gay agenda used the excuse "gay marriage is now legal" as a justification for indoctrinating children in our public schools with the idea that perverted homosexual relations are as "normal" as heterosexual relationships.

One man, David Parker,of Lexington, Massachusetts was not even allowed to opt his kindergarten-age son out of class when gay indoctrination was occurring. He is trying to get his civil rights case heard by the U.S. Supreme Court.

http://www.davidparkerfund.org/html/blog.html

Another of their favorite whines is, "How is my gay marriage going to harm your traditional marriage?"

( A scene at City Hall in San Francisco )

"Next."

"Good morning. We want to apply for a marriage license."

"Names?"

"Tim and Jim Jones."

"Jones? Are you related? I see a resemblance."

"Yes, we're brothers."

"Brothers? You can't get married."

"Why not? Aren't you giving marriage licenses to same gender couples?"

"Yes, thousands. But we haven't had any siblings. That's incest!"

"Incest?" No, we are not gay."

"Not gay? Then why do you want to get married?"

"For the financial benefits, of course. And we do love each other.
Besides, we don't have any other prospects."

"But we're issuing marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples who've been
denied equal protection under the law. If you are not gay, you can get
married to a woman."

"Wait a minute. A gay man has the same right to marry a woman as I have.
But just because I'm straight doesn't mean I want to marry a woman.

I want to marry Jim."

"Are you going to discriminate against us just
because we are not gay?"

"All right, all right. I'll give you your license.

Next."

"Hi. We are here to get married."

"Names?"

"John Smith, Jane James, Robert Green, and June Johnson."

"Who wants to marry whom?"

"We all want to marry each other."

"But there are four of you!"

"That's right. You see, we're all bisexual. I love Jane and Robert, Jane
loves me and June, June loves Robert and Jane, and Robert loves June and
me. All of us getting married together is the only way that we can express
our sexual preferences in a marital relationship."

"But we've only been granting licenses to gay and lesbian couples."

"So you're discriminating against bisexuals!"

"No, it's just that, well, the traditional idea of marriage is that it's
just for couples."

"Since when are you standing on tradition?"

"Well, I mean, you have to draw the line somewhere."

"Who says? There's no logical reason to limit marriage to couples. The more
the better. Besides, we demand our rights! The mayor says the constitution
guarantees equal protection under the law. Give us a marriage license!"

"All right, all right.

Next."

"Hello, I'd like a marriage license."

"In what names?"

"David Deets."

"And the other man?"

"That's all. I want to marry myself."

"Marry yourself? What do you mean?"

"Well, my psychiatrist says I have a dual personality, so I want to marry
the two together. Maybe I can file a joint income-tax return."

"That does it! I quit!! You people are making a mockery of marriage!!"