Posted on 11/06/2008 12:06:39 PM PST by buccaneer81
David Harsanyi commentary: Robust dissent, not unity, needed in Washington Thursday, November 6, 2008 3:23 AM By DAVID HARSANYI DispatchPolitics
Unity? No, thank you.
Unity: n. the state of being one; oneness -- especially when your chosen political party happens to win an election.
Barack Obama is now my president. Though I wonder whether irascible Democrats who rode around with those snazzy bumper stickers reading "He's not my president" for the past eight years realize the irony of their call for national harmony.
Let's hope there's none.
Winning elections is one thing; governing is quite another. It is impossible to deny that Obama ran one of the sharpest, most diligent and exhilarating campaigns in modern American history or, for that matter, that the liberal wing of the Democratic Party has won a resounding mandate to run the country.
That only means we need a robust and principled opposition.
My children continually are lectured by well-meaning adults about the mystifying power culled from our differences, the strength we derive from our disparate upbringing and the power of diversity.
So why, one wonders, does this belief not extend to our politics and ideology? Why do we strive to shed individuality and become herds of devotees and shills?
America should be a place that features spirited debate, a place where partisanship is reignited in a fury of righteous opposition, a place where Republicans find a spine and oppose harmony whenever appropriate.
And I don't mean a mindlessly cantankerous opposition. Nor do I mean resistance to all Democratic policy prescriptions. No, I am talking only about judges, energy policy, taxes, foreign policy, health care, the budget, education policy, international trade, free trade, gun control, Social Security and about 30 to 40 other policy questions.
In this regard, Obama is faced with a similar predicament George W. Bush wrestled during his own presidency: too much unity in Washington.
Under Bush, the fissures between factions in the Republican Party -- fiscally conservative, socially conservative, moderate -- began appearing in subtle ways early and eventually undermined the right's consensus and destroyed the party.
Obama will enter the White House claiming the mantle of unity. Yet on a practical level, it's impossible to please everyone. Moreover, despite the momentous victory (the country's first African-American president), he still has about 48 percent of the people opposing his agenda -- some of them bitterly.
For many conservatives, Obama, who has displayed a thoughtful curiosity of his opponents' ideological arguments more than most politicians, is less frightening than the coupling of Obama with the shrill, knee-jerk partisanship of majority leaders Rep. Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Harry Reid. They don't believe in unity; they believe in victory.
When Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., was asked recently about his party's plans, two of the top issues he offered would destabilize harmony. One is card-check legislation, a Soviet-style measure for unions, and the other is the so-called fairness doctrine, which is aimed at shutting down the voice of political conservative opposition.
"The very same people who don't want the fairness doctrine want the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) to limit pornography on the air," Schumer said. "I am for that. . . . But you can't say 'government hands off' in one area to a commercial enterprise but you are allowed to intervene in another. That's not consistent."
So you see, conservative opinion is the moral equivalent of pornography. Doesn't sound like unity to me.
Republicans shouldn't be fooled. They should be ready to fight. They clearly weren't ready in this election.
David Harsanyi writes for The Denver Post.
dharsanyi@denverpost.com
Maybe Palin-Pawlenty 2012?
Dissent is Patriotic!
I seem to recall from my history class, back in the day when the public schools actually taught history, that there was a really catchy national unity slogan in vogue about two decades before I was born. Now how did it go?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Oh, I remember: “Ein Volk! Ein Reich! Ein Furher!”
The battle line has never been more clearly drawn. Will be writing a lot of letters to editors. If I can find a suitable political party, will be doing some “community activism.”
good idea. i complained in a macy’s department store today
about cnn being on their tvs and they apologized and changed channels.
we need to fight back immediately.
How about: Palin-Jindal or Jindal-Palin....I could go for either one.
If someone is interested in working on it and showing me how to raise money to keep it going, I have reserved http://www.theobamaresistance.com One of the things I hope it can do is defund the teachers unions by getting Republicans to opt out, get refunds, or give all the dues money to charity.
Great idea Doug!
bttt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.