Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FCC Expands Use of Airwaves: 'White Space' To Be Opened To Devices Connected To Web
Washington Pest ^ | 11/5/08 | Cecilia Kang

Posted on 11/05/2008 5:52:10 AM PST by steve-b

Preachers on the pulpit, Guns N' Roses and others who fear their wireless microphones would be disrupted by widespread public access to certain unused airwaves were drowned out by high-tech titans Google and Microsoft in a federal ruling yesterday.

The Federal Communications Commission approved a plan that would allow those airwaves, called white spaces, to be used by gadgets such as cellphones and laptops connected to the Internet once that spectrum becomes available after the national transition from analog to digital television in February.

Opponents of the plan, including preachers and entertainers, say such devices could interfere with broadcast channels on nearby spectrum and with wireless microphones, which are used in live performances and operate on the same frequencies. The plan's proponents, including Google and Microsoft, say it would open more wireless technologies to consumers....

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Technical
KEYWORDS: internet; whitespace; wireless; worldwideweb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 11/05/2008 5:52:11 AM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Opponents of the plan, including preachers and entertainers,

Ahh yes, the elite few are concerned about their income stream. Too bad that they didn't spend 10 minutes studying the issue and seeing that there are alternatives.
2 posted on 11/05/2008 6:00:23 AM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
WHITE SPACE??

Let me be the first to say it -- that's RACIST!! That type of talk is not allowed beginning today. Report to camp, on the double.

3 posted on 11/05/2008 6:01:16 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

The better wireless microphones seek and find alternate channels. Diversity is the word. Anyone not using such equipment is probably stupid.


4 posted on 11/05/2008 6:02:40 AM PST by TommyDale (I) (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

I expect the government will add on a huge fee to all our electric bills, cable bills...anything associated with this analog thing and do it by unit...5 cells=5 fees..5 TVs=5 fees....etc etc


5 posted on 11/05/2008 6:04:35 AM PST by Sacajaweau (I'm planting corn...Have to feed my car...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Anybody who has read the article, what are the frequencies of operation they are talking about here? I tried to read the article, but the comPost wants me to register. No friggin’ way that's happening....
6 posted on 11/05/2008 6:12:10 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Silence is not always a Sign of Wisdom, but Babbling is ever a Mark of Folly. - B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker

It says in the second paragraph that this is about the spectrum currently used by analog TV (and will be available after the digital transition). Since incumbent users of wireless microphones are involved, I presume it refers to between-channels slices of the analog TV spectrum.


7 posted on 11/05/2008 6:15:04 AM PST by steve-b (Intelligent design is to evolutionary biology what socialism is to free-market economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
Details here
8 posted on 11/05/2008 6:17:36 AM PST by relee ('Till the blue skies drive the dark clouds far away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

You pick any allocation plan and somebody’s going to feel shafted. We use too much of the spectrum for the spaces between channels; supposedly this gets better in February but we’ll see.


9 posted on 11/05/2008 6:19:18 AM PST by fstab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: relee
Thanks.

I have a couple of friends who own a bunch of 930 Mhz (+/-) paging licenses all up and down the eastern seaboard. I installed a bunch of “license saver” paging terminals for them several years ago. They knew when they bid on these licenses that paging was on the way out, but they also knew that something new would undoubtedly come along and fill their license spectrum. They were hoping this ruling would include them. Guess not, since it's essentially 698-805 Mhz.....

10 posted on 11/05/2008 6:34:38 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Silence is not always a Sign of Wisdom, but Babbling is ever a Mark of Folly. - B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
It says in the second paragraph that this is about the spectrum currently used by analog TV (and will be available after the digital transition). Since incumbent users of wireless microphones are involved, I presume it refers to between-channels slices of the analog TV spectrum

Thanks. I was looking for specific frequencies, since "analog TV" covers a fairly wide spectrum. Analog anything is a spectrum hog by today's definition. I'm glad to see this is happening.....

11 posted on 11/05/2008 6:38:14 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Silence is not always a Sign of Wisdom, but Babbling is ever a Mark of Folly. - B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker

Even the full article doesn’t go into that level of detail — it’s more directed to the FCC policy decision than to technical implementation.


12 posted on 11/05/2008 6:44:48 AM PST by steve-b (Intelligent design is to evolutionary biology what socialism is to free-market economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

http://www.shure.com/ProAudio/PressRoom/WhiteSpaces/index.htm

Everything you want to know about “White Spaces”.


13 posted on 11/05/2008 6:49:29 AM PST by Walmartian (Doesnt sound very Hopenchangey to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
.. it’s more directed to the FCC policy decision than to technical implementation.

If you've ever had any dealings with the FCC, you realize straight away that "technical implementation" isn't the FCC's strong suit, thus this article and it's lack of information from the source is completely understandable......

14 posted on 11/05/2008 7:02:02 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Silence is not always a Sign of Wisdom, but Babbling is ever a Mark of Folly. - B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

These people have already invested money in expensive radio equipment that will now be worthless. This happened during the Clinton Administration when the Government decided to appropriate the so-called pcs spectrum and auction it off to the highest bidder, ignoring the businesses that were using that bandwidth at the time, mostly fire and police departments and construction jobsites with two way radios. Oh well, buy stock in Motorola. People will have to buy new stuff now.


15 posted on 11/05/2008 7:14:22 AM PST by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
The better, as in the more costly. Add to that systems that have ben in use for several years - working just fine and causing to trouble.

Yet MS and Google come in and “win” the “right” to basically take over this airspace?

And the proposed way of dealing with it - spend money for new wireless systems and/or register your “events” where you use such technology in an FCC-run database (where is this database? OH - it hasn't been set up yet?) each and every time you have a church service or other event where you use your wireless stuff.

I see this, much like the “DTV” switchover, as more of a sales generator than a real necessity. Forced obsolescence. Where are Greenpeace and the other enviro-nazis out there screaming about the landfills and the wasted electronics?

16 posted on 02/08/2009 6:08:58 AM PST by TheBattman (Pray for our country....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sportutegrl

More info:

http://www.sweetwater.com/feature/wireless/white-spaces.php


17 posted on 02/08/2009 6:10:37 AM PST by TheBattman (Pray for our country....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: relee

Nice link to one of the parties who twisted the government’s arm into hijacking it for their purposes.


18 posted on 02/08/2009 6:11:23 AM PST by TheBattman (Pray for our country....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
Anybody who has read the article, what are the frequencies of operation they are talking about here?

The "white space" they're referring to will be the portion of the band spectrum left vacant by the Television stations after the conversion to digital television is complete. The reason these frequencies are desireable for high-speed internet for example, is because transmisions in this space are subject to multi-path communications. "Multi-Path" is the reason you'd see ghosting of images on your TV due to the analog nature of transmissions. Multi-path is bad for TV, but great for wireless internet access.

19 posted on 02/08/2009 6:16:36 AM PST by usconservative (The Stock Markets dropped 4% on Inauguration Day. That's a historic Presidency indeed!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

That’s a good link, especially for the layman.


20 posted on 02/08/2009 6:17:47 AM PST by usconservative (The Stock Markets dropped 4% on Inauguration Day. That's a historic Presidency indeed!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson