Posted on 11/03/2008 6:31:04 AM PST by dervish
Representative Nadler (NY-D) on why Obama attended Wright's Church:
"This is not going to be complimentary to Senator Obama ..... he didn't have the political courage to make a statement and walk out."
I have much more .............. but I had to get this up. I have much devastating video including Nadler professing that if "that there really were phone banks in Gaza, that would be a major campaign issue". He sid it would be all over the media and be a major problem for the campaign. And laughed at the idea of the Gaza campaign contributions - a story Atlas broke in July.
Here are the phone banks (al jizz!).
======================
video link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aG33wVmwD2M
Link to Atlas Shrugs more info
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Atlas/Pamela Geller went to Florida to rally the Jewish vote.
Just a shot here but... The ENTIRE democRAT party?
please put out to your list
"This is not going to be complimentary to Senator Obama ..... he didn't have the political courage to make a statement and walk out."
That makes the huge assumption that he disagreed with Wright. In my opinion, Obama was indifferent in matters of religion but was directed to Wright's church as where the up and coming black Chicago politician should put in his time and he felt comfortable with the political sermons.
Jerrold Fatler defines his own statement by living up to his party’s reputation as a bunch of cowards. He isn’t able to tell anyone the REAL reason Obama stayed at the sermons: OBAMA AGREED WITH EVERY WORD OUT OF WRIGHT’S MOUTH.
How does 0bama’s several alliances with radical Muslims like Farrakhan sit with the Jews who fawn and drool over him?
Of the 0bama supporters around here, the most starry eyed sycophants are the Jewish ones.
You’re right: Nadler’s statement DOES NOT take into account that Obama might actually agree with Wright. Either way, if he doesn’t have political courage OR he agrees with Wright, he’s not fit to be our President.
“Jerrold Nadler”
Are you still calling him by his nom de pol?
Didn’t you know he’s really Jabba the Hut???
We have been told for very many years that if we listen to hate or a hateful joke, we are as guilty as the one who is telling it. We are obliged to stand up to the “hater” and/or to walk away.
Suddenly, this rule doesn’t apply with regard to listening to hate over a 20 year period of time.
My nephew was proud of himself for standing up to his own church with a letter of protest ending in these words:
Senator Obama may disagree with the church about the government’s role in legislating abortion, but when I look into his soul I see a man that truly empathizes with the poor and the downtrodden. I see a man who is devoted to his wife, I see a man who cares about innocent children dying needlessly, and I see a man who is struggling to be a real Christian. So, on November 4th, this sinner will cast his vote for Barack Obama and as a struggling Christian I’ll feel good about it.
......................
But, despite my nephew’s ability to look into folk’s souls, an ability I have never had, he doesn’t see anything wrong with his hero sitting in silence for 20 years of hate speech.
The thugs of the world are salivating...
Funny, I look into Obama’s soul and I see an opportunistic thug, who tells people what they want to hear in order to get power.
People who try to look into each other’s souls see different things. Bush looked into Putin’s eyes and reportedly “saw his soul”. McCain looked into his eyes and saw “KGB”.
I think it all boils down to whoever has better discernment.
Just say it like it is. Obama is a coward.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.