Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Deepak Chopra, Conservative-Bashing Guru of the WaPo
Newsbusters ^ | November 2, 2008 | Tim Graham

Posted on 11/02/2008 3:05:29 PM PST by St. Louis Conservative

On Saturday's Religion page in The Washington Post, they highlighted the latest hot item from their On Faith website, which really should be called On Doubt, since it so heavily promotes atheism and liberalism. This time, it was New Age guru Deepak Chopra, denouncing the allegedly ridiculous idea that God should play a role in the voting booth:

There never will be, and never should be, a religious reason to pick one candidate over another. God hasn't personally voted in an American election, but he keeps voting by proxy. In an ideal world that would never happen. Supernatural beings aren't citizens. Omniscient deities don't make choices (since they already know every outcome in advance). To anyone who holds a serious regard for the Constitution, voting your faith should be a private matter, not a public one. It wouldn't make me happy to know that a Catholic friend voted for someone solely because he was a Catholic, or that a Jewish friend voted for someone solely because he took a hawkish stand pro Israel, but that's their right. No public discussion is required.

Yet we have to be realistic. God is going to vote by proxy this year. The real question is where his massive voting bloc is heading, now that the Republican Party has been so thoroughly discredited. Can we hope that religious voting will return to being a private matter? In the past, various noxious movements that were anti-Catholic and anti-Semitic made grabs for political leverage, only to sink back into the miasma. Is something like that about to happen now?

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: deepakchopra; elitism; mediabias; washingtonpost; wp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 11/02/2008 3:05:29 PM PST by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

So Deepak Chopra thinks we should still have slavery?


2 posted on 11/02/2008 3:09:50 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

“now that the Republican Party has been so thoroughly discredited.”

What planet are these reptiles living on?


3 posted on 11/02/2008 3:10:16 PM PST by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Chopra is a chalatan snake oil salesman who pedals feel-good universal spirtualism and oneness. He thinks levitation and transportation are possible. He’ a QUAKE who has sold a lot of dumb books. Guess that makes him an expert.


4 posted on 11/02/2008 3:13:09 PM PST by downtownconservative (Intelligence sans reason is vainglorious pulp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: downtownconservative

“charlatan” oops.


5 posted on 11/02/2008 3:13:51 PM PST by downtownconservative (Intelligence sans reason is vainglorious pulp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative
There never will be, and never should be, a religious reason to pick one candidate over another.

Here's a secular one: abortion. That's a good reason. Even atheists believe in the cause for life.

And he said unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which be Caesar's, and unto God the things which be God's. Luke 20:25.

We have a duty to vote against evil, in all its smooth-talking forms.

6 posted on 11/02/2008 3:14:43 PM PST by pray4liberty (This election will separate the wheat from the tares. Watch, pray, work and VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: downtownconservative

QUACK-—so much for typing prowess!


7 posted on 11/02/2008 3:14:52 PM PST by downtownconservative (Intelligence sans reason is vainglorious pulp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative
Chopra is what I imagine the devil would look like. He's one ugly dude.

If Obama wins this election, we all better get right with the Lord. Those who voted for him are going to be left behind for sure.

sw

8 posted on 11/02/2008 3:17:43 PM PST by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsc

According to David Icke that would be the Alpha Draconis star in the Draco System.


9 posted on 11/02/2008 3:18:24 PM PST by LukeL (Yasser Arafat: "I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Deepak Chopra is one of those Indian Hindu conmen who suck money from credulous idiot white women who think they can live forever if they just do the right pelvic exercise. He unethically trades on his turdworld MD degree to gain credibility and probably score a lot.
10 posted on 11/02/2008 3:18:27 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: downtownconservative

Chopra is a “self described” expert on religion, but his books preach only thing: be one with nature. (I know, I had an ex-GF who read that crap). Just because you wrote books on a subject which doesn’t have an exact definition, one should not be an ‘expert” on it.

The most idiotic and rude thing that Chopra can do is disseminate politics which is a subject totally alien from his make-up world of spiritualism. This is like Bugs Bunny explaining E=MC2...Chopra should just stick to TV infomercials.


11 posted on 11/02/2008 3:18:36 PM PST by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

What would TuPoc- Choke-on-Oprah know about God?


12 posted on 11/02/2008 3:19:13 PM PST by dragonblustar (Once abolish the God, and the government becomes the God - G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Sonewhere there’s a ‘dicount’ motel missing a night manager.


13 posted on 11/02/2008 3:21:02 PM PST by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: downtownconservative

Did you mean QUACK ? :)


14 posted on 11/02/2008 3:22:00 PM PST by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Brief translation: “I’m a religious expert. Religion has nothing to do with politics. So vote for Obama!”

Sure, that makes a lot of sense.


15 posted on 11/02/2008 3:22:25 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: downtownconservative

ok never mind. Didn’t see post 7.


16 posted on 11/02/2008 3:23:11 PM PST by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tbpiper

LOL.


17 posted on 11/02/2008 3:24:06 PM PST by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

There never will be, and never should be, a religious reason to pick one candidate over another. God hasn’t personally voted in an American election, but he keeps voting by proxy. In an ideal world that would never happen. Supernatural beings aren’t citizens. Omniscient deities don’t make choices (since they already know every outcome in advance). To anyone who holds a serious regard for the Constitution, voting your faith should be a private matter, not a public one. It wouldn’t make me happy to know that a Catholic friend voted for someone solely because he was a Catholic, or that a Jewish friend voted for someone solely because he took a hawkish stand pro Israel, but that’s their right. No public discussion is required.

______________________________________________________

He should be ticked that so many of his black friends are voting for O solely because he is black.


18 posted on 11/02/2008 3:32:19 PM PST by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

I see nothing wrong with praying for Our Lord to send us a leader who loves this country and will protect the unborn. This could very well be 0bama. Then I will pray and believe that God will fill his heart to bursting with love for America and for the unborn.


19 posted on 11/02/2008 4:27:53 PM PST by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Posted by our friend St. Louis “Conservative”


20 posted on 11/02/2008 4:28:55 PM PST by word_warrior_bob (You can now see my amazing doggie and new puppy on my homepage!! Come say hello to Jake & Sonny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson