Quo Warranto filed in California (against Obama)

Writers Syndicate ^ | Oct 31 | David Herndon

[wintertime]

Not only that, but the Clinton crime machine didn’t pursue it either.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Any thoughts on why the Clintoons haven't? This has me wondering.

[kralcmot]

how did you find this?

but anyway, its very interesting

read the first part, skimmed the rest

this took days and days of effort

it seems to be predicated on the theory that since Obama, et als, did not answer the Phillip Berg suit in the 30 days required that he/they have admitted the truth of the allegations....not withstanding the dismissal of that suit

not being an attorney i cannot comment on the nature of this theory

i also note that the “relator” declares that he is not an attorney...but who else but an attorney could have drafted such an arcane demand?

on the News? NOT

discussed by any media? NOT

is this an FR exclusive?

Developing....

[Moonman62]

Maybe Obama thinks it’s good strategy to keep his opponents expending their hopes and resources tilting at windmills.

[Moonman62]

I don’t think it’s because she didn’t want to win at any cost.

[The Californian]

As a further note, I am planning to call all of my state representatives and ask them to craft legislation giving the Secretary of State both the right and the responsibility to verify eligibility of the candidate in future elections.

I believe in Pennsylvania that someone is already doing this.

Every man, woman and child should do the same; call, write, e-mail your representatives and ask them to correct this ridiculous situation.

This is ridiculous.

[yldstrk]

I agree. It’s not a technicality.

[ProtectOurFreedom]

Wow. The writ Herndon has prepared is incredible. A true constitutional crisis is really brewing, of a magnitude that completely dwarfs Nixon's shenanigans.

Whereas, BARACK OBAMA, et als, you have SEVENTY-TWO HOURS (3) days from the date of receipt of this document to answer each and every element of this WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO as you are COMMANDED TO DO by ORDER OF ‘WE THE PEOPLE’ in the relation of: by and through the lawful status and delegation of authority of David Allan Herndon who has legal standing as one of ‘we the people’ thereof, and to “show cause” with substantive and lawful proof in consonance with the Constitution of California 1849 that defendant BARACK OBAMA currently holds office lawfully, TO THE COMPLETE TERMS AND CONDITIONS REQUIRED BY LAW; and: THAT YOU HAVE OBEYED AND ARE IN CONSONANCE WITH ARTICLE II, Section 1, clause 5 of the Constitution for the United States 1787-1791 in accordance with law; or in the alternative, you must SUMMARILY AND IMMEDIATELY TAKE DEFENDANT BARACK OBAMA, et als, OFF THE 2008 ELECTION BALLOT and defendant must vacate his office immediately, without pay, and without further remuneration or benefits and be forever prohibited from serving in the public trust again, and pay damages to me.

[yldstrk]

A liar and obfuscator like Obama will never be a martyr.

[cripplecreek]

Maybe Obama thinks it’s good strategy to keep his opponents expending their hopes and resources tilting at windmills.

Hopes don't cost a cent and I'm not aware that the RNC is expending a dime either. The democrats and media sure don't want to talk about this and since you are so sure that talking about it is so damaging to the GOP, you should wonder why the media and dems aren't using it.

[GBA]

Makes me wonder also, but I'd like to know one way or another and have the issue put behind us. I had to produce a BC for a security clearance and what I was doing was hardly in the same league as POTUS with near total access. The 0bama campaign's actions are somewhat suspect giving that they are unwilling to reveal much of anything about 0bama and his campaign, from his medical records to birth certificate to finances to donors and supporters.

0bama's track record for being honest when he does talk about himself isn't all that great as the Snopes page on him talks about. The few articles about his autobiographies point out inaccuracies in them as well as calling into question his authorship. Some misspoken comments are common in any campaign, but his total seems a bit high.

[cripplecreek]

A true constitutional crisis is really brewing

I agree and the last thing we need is the clowns in DC deciding to make changes. All we really need is a clarification of the process that approves elgibility under existing constitutional law.

[Ouderkirk]

Limbaugh wants him beat at the ballot box....

[AFreeBird]

At which point some five star general says “Who the hell are you?”

I don't think we have any five stars at the moment. All the JCS's are four stars. AFAIK

I was under the impression that a 5 star was more for war time, for a Supreme Commander of [all military branches] forces in a theater of war [Eisenhower in Europe - MacArthur in Asia]

[AFreeBird]

Limbaugh wants him beat at the ballot box....

Same here; beyond a reasonable doubt - an old fashioned ass whoop'n would be even better.

[sportutegrl]

This may have the effect of making more than a few people reconsider voting for 0bama. Most people would want to avoid a constitutional crisis, and I don’t think anyone wants to take a chance on Biden becoming president. Better just go ahead and vote for McCain and avoid this mess.

[I-ambush]

Maybe Hillary is hoping to be named president by the Electoral College or Congress if he’s ineligible; this wouldn’t be possible if McCain is elected.

[Moonman62]

In total that raises real doubts. But it’s a shame the GOP can’t beat the Donks on the issues alone, because the Donks really suck.

[djf]

Thing is, regardless of the outcome next Tuesday, this question is not going to go away until it is properly answered.

It would be way, way, way better for the country if it were answered sooner rather than later.

[Redbob]

You might suspect instead that there is no requirement in the Constitution that a Presidential candidate (nor anyone else) *have* a birth certificate, nor show it to anyone.

And you’d be right.

[wintertime]

Limbaugh wants him beat at the ballot box....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

That Obama chose to appeal a court ruling demanding that he produce his birth certificate is NOT normal. A normal, honest, straight forward American would have produced a valid birth certificate!

That Obama is **not** normal and is behaving irrationally is one more reason not to vote for him.

So?...If Limbaugh wants Obama beaten why has he essentially ignored this issue until the last minute? And....Even now Rush Limbaugh has only mentioned it as a throw away comment.

Sorry...But Rush Limbaugh has definitely **failed** his listeners. I am very disappointed in him.