how did you find this?
but anyway, its very interesting
read the first part, skimmed the rest
this took days and days of effort
it seems to be predicated on the theory that since Obama, et als, did not answer the Phillip Berg suit in the 30 days required that he/they have admitted the truth of the allegations....not withstanding the dismissal of that suit
not being an attorney i cannot comment on the nature of this theory
i also note that the “relator” declares that he is not an attorney...but who else but an attorney could have drafted such an arcane demand?
on the News? NOT
discussed by any media? NOT
is this an FR exclusive?
Developing....
As a further note, I am planning to call all of my state representatives and ask them to craft legislation giving the Secretary of State both the right and the responsibility to verify eligibility of the candidate in future elections.
I believe in Pennsylvania that someone is already doing this.
Every man, woman and child should do the same; call, write, e-mail your representatives and ask them to correct this ridiculous situation.
This is ridiculous.