Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This guy might be a lawyer, but the last time I looked the burden of proof is not on the defendant.


2 posted on 10/31/2008 4:21:46 AM PDT by ConservativeGreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeGreek

This isn’t a criminal case, it’s about his qualifying for the office he is running for. Before hiring someone, doesn’t a responsible employer check an individual’s references and make sure his/her experience and education are in line with what the resume says? We are Senator Obama’s employer!


3 posted on 10/31/2008 4:26:13 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Barack Obama: In Error and arrogant -- he's errogant!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeGreek

You are looking at this wrong. Obama is not the defendant. He is the APPLICANT.


37 posted on 10/31/2008 4:54:43 AM PDT by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeGreek

bingo....and since the courts keep ruling that the average joe (concerned citizen) can’t bring a lawsuit then just who the hell can?


49 posted on 10/31/2008 5:06:00 AM PDT by tatsinfla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeGreek

When the “defendant” is pursuing a position that requires specific conditions for eligibility, then the burden of proving compliance must specifically rest with the “defendant”.


52 posted on 10/31/2008 5:09:18 AM PDT by MortMan (Those who stand for nothing fall for anything. - Alexander Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeGreek
but the last time I looked the burden of proof is not on the defendant.

Anyone applying for any legal entry level job has to prove eligibility to legally work in this country.

Is Obama above the law or not?

56 posted on 10/31/2008 5:14:23 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (Obama's Marxism--Chains you can believe in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeGreek

Hussein is NOT A DEFENDANT!! He is asking US to hire him for the job of PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!!

These debauched Marxists (Democrats) who are trying to abolish and destroy the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA line by line are on fighting ground!!

The spirits of the men who drafted, fought, suffered, and died for what this Constitution and the Declaration of Independence stand for are still with us.

Moreover, God is watching us - and NOT from a distance.


58 posted on 10/31/2008 5:17:19 AM PDT by Twinkie (PRESERVE OUR CONSTITUTION !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeGreek
This guy might be a lawyer, but the last time I looked the burden of proof is not on the defendant.

Except this is not a trial so 0bama is not a defendant, he is running for the highest office in the land.

He should be required to "prove" he is eligible to be the POTUS just like you have to "prove" you have insurance to drive a car

72 posted on 10/31/2008 6:04:56 AM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Election '08, the year McCain defined the word "dilemma")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeGreek

It sure as hell is if you want to be president.


103 posted on 10/31/2008 9:55:12 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeGreek

Look at it like your dad had died and your sister told you she had a deathbed statement from him that she was to inherit all the estate; would you ask for proof then?


128 posted on 10/31/2008 12:34:09 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeGreek
This guy might be a lawyer, but the last time I looked the burden of proof is not on the defendant.

Yet, that is a nonissue as far as discovery rules apply, and in filing a response to the charges. OBama and the DNC did not even respond to the charges, so it's equivalent to pleading nolo contendre.

Meaning he still can be charged.

151 posted on 10/31/2008 8:50:59 PM PDT by Polarik ("The Greater Evil")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson