Posted on 10/30/2008 1:37:29 PM PDT by Kenneth J. Conner
PRESS RELEASE from Kenneth J. Conner paid for by Kenneth J. Conner
OBAMA CALLED ON TO RELEASE HOUSE APPRAISAL
Kenneth J. Conner, a plaintiff against the bank that financed the Rezko purchase of 5050 S. Greenwood and released a portion of 5050 S. Greenwood for purchase by Obama, calls for immediate release of the Obama House Appraisal (OHA).
OHA is conspicuously missing from hundreds of pages of document images at the Obama web site that purportedly comprise extensive, sufficient, and thorough disclosure of House and Lot transaction details related to:
Obama purchase of a portion of 5050 S. Greenwood
Obama purchase of the adjacent mansion (address withheld; this property’s appraisal is that which is requested)
Mr. Conner requires the document as relevant to his court case, and suggests that public release 72 hours in advance of polls opening on November 4, 2008 (being no later than the morning of Nov. 1, 2008) is in the public interest. Release of the full document, as opposed to the appraiser’s conclusion of value only, is deemed pertinent to the
PRESS RELEASE from Kenneth J. Conner paid for by Kenneth J. Conner
publicly expressed hypothesis that Barack Obama received a payoff, bribe, kickback, or the like, as a result of Tony Rezko paying $625,000 asking price for land thought by Conner and others to be worth a maximum of $500,000:
On the same day that Obama closed on the mansion at $300,000 below asking price ($1,650,000 purchase; $1,950,000 ask)
On the same day that Obama purchased his mansion from the same seller
Mr. Conner believes that his prospects of receiving OHA in pure form are diminished as time elapses, and as Obama may gain the power of Presidential Pardon and/or other capacity to prevent Conner from viewing and presenting the appraisal as an exhibit within his court case.
Mr. Conner believes that requesting OHA publicly increases the likelihood of his receiving it in pure form and may place him “off limits” with respect to certain forms of potential retribution.
Mr. Conner believes that lack of OHA disclosure thus far evidences a desire to suppress its contents.
Mr. Conner believes that OHA is relevant to his court case because it may support his appraisal review stating that 5050 S. Greenwood was worth a maximum of $500,000 when purchased by Rezko.
Why does he even need such an expensive home? Wouldn’t a more modest place be more socially justified?
Maybe he could ask him for his birth certificate while he is at it. He could need to verify citizenship in relationship to his lawsuit!
“Why does he even need such an expensive home? Wouldn’t a more modest place be more socially justified?”
That’s the avg. price in that neighborhood. Kenwood/Hyde Park is one of the most exclusive housing addition neighborhoods. It also allowed his to get a kickback!!
“Question Authority!” That’s what the agitators on the Left always say.
So what happens when we question his authority?
That's the avg. price in that neighborhood. Kenwood/Hyde Park is one of the most exclusive housing addition neighborhoods. It also allowed him to get a kickback!!
bttt
Is that his district? Any reason he has to live in that community? Again, it seems like a luxurious expense when others are living in rat infested apartment buildings.
I believe the appraisal belongs to the lender and Obama’s permission to release it is not necessary.
After all, he's never there anyway!
Oh... What's that? Barack Obama is only generous with my money?!? How do ya figure?!?
Ask Joe the Plumber... as soon as he gets back from court...
“Why does he even need such an expensive home?”
Upity Wife
Too bad, Mr. Conner. Peasants like you don’t have “standing” to ask such impudent questions about the elite.
Pingy, dingy.
You are correct IF the original client ordering the appraisal was the bank....thenit is the bank’s property. If the appraisal was ordered by 0bama, it is 0bama’s property, not the banks. In real estate appraisal work, the client owns the appraisal. The client, to an appraiser, is the person,company, etc. who ordered the appraisal.
If the bank was the client, they do not need 0bama’s permission to release the appraisal.
Now comes the question of copyright infringement. The appraiser who created (made) the appraisal has a copyright on the appraisal itself (Washington State just had a lawsuit to that effect). If the appraisal is copied by any person(s) and distributed via the internet, etc., it would be a copyright infringement and the appraiser could sue (and most likely collect) from the person(s) copying the appraisal.
Don’t you know that there are two standards! Our side has an impossibly high standard, held up by these weasels, and there are different standards for them.
Yuck.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.