Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/29/2008 6:52:04 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: neverdem

“Voters asking: Who will take my guns?”


NOBODY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


2 posted on 10/29/2008 6:58:08 PM PDT by ladyvet (WOLVERINES!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Who will take my guns?

A SWAT team, after I, and several of them, are dead.


3 posted on 10/29/2008 6:59:02 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Well, McCain is not perfect at a “C” rating, but compared to Obamao’s “F” rating he is darn near Charlton Heston.


4 posted on 10/29/2008 7:00:25 PM PDT by padre35 (Sarah Palin is the one we've been waiting for..Rom 10.10..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Anybody who thinks the 2nd Amendment is about hunting is foolishly naive.


5 posted on 10/29/2008 7:00:34 PM PDT by RobinOfKingston (Democrats, the party of evil. Republicans, the party of stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

There is NO right to hunt with a hunting rifle.

There IS a right to bear arms.


6 posted on 10/29/2008 7:00:44 PM PDT by omega4179 (Stop Hussein Vote McCain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
It is trully amazing that any gun owners in this story think that Obama won't “take their guns”.

Do these people have the capacity to look up some information on this Marxist's Illinois senate record? Or his anti-2nd affiliations?

If there are gun owners this ignorant of Obama’s plans, they are not only dangerous to our freedoms and liberties but to them selves and those around them when they are handling a firearm ... jeez, what dopes!

7 posted on 10/29/2008 7:02:52 PM PDT by CapnJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Here’s some background on Peter Snyder from Lake Ariel. Prior election info first(gleaned from http://www.ocshooters.com/newsletters/04/09.htm):

“Kerry’s the choice
I have been hunting and fishing for over 50 years. I am a Republican. I am voting for Kerry. Here are some of Kerry’s positions on guns directly from his Web site:
Kerry is a strong supporter of sportsmen’s rights to hunt and fish. He is a lifelong hunter. He is a gun owner and he believes in the right to bear arms. Kerry emphasized his strong belief in the Second Amendment. He has said that he will “work to ensure that the basic rights of all Americans to legally and safely hunt and fish are protected.”
He will support greater land conservation for hunting and fishing, and will work to prevent the construction of new roads into our remaining roadless areas, specifically to prevent further fragmentation of our forests.
Bush, on the other hand, is clueless on the environment. He has a devastating environmental record which will have long-term detrimental affects on hunting and fishing and our own health. Bush released new guidelines in January 2003 that will reduce federal wetlands protection.
Bush proposed a rule that would remove mercury emissions from Clean Air Act regulations that have been used to limit the most toxic air pollutants. Mercury contamination in fish is poisoning us. Just read the advisories in your 2004 fishing regulation manual.
Pete Snyder
Lake Ariel, Pa., (psnyder@ptdprolog.net)”

A little poking around reveals that this character is an evironmentalist/elitist/ignoramus. His opinion as a “shooter” is worthless.


8 posted on 10/29/2008 7:12:38 PM PDT by ExpatGator (Extending logic since 1961.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
“I feel that hunting is a right, and I don’t think anyone is going to do away with hunting.”

With all due respect, Peter Snyder, "life long Republican", you should study the Constitution a little more carefully.

9 posted on 10/29/2008 7:12:43 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Election '08, the year McCain defined the word "dilemma")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

For a gun-owning hunter he sure votes for Dems a lot!


10 posted on 10/29/2008 7:14:06 PM PDT by ExpatGator (Extending logic since 1961.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Obama: “I don’t believe people should be able to own guns.”
11 posted on 10/29/2008 7:14:57 PM PDT by Entrepreneur (The environmental movement is filled with watermelons - green on the outside, red on the inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Remember, Libs get their way via baby steps, like abortion revolving from third trimester to infanticide over time. If we give in on assault weapons, we’ll sooner or later be surrendering handguns and then our rifles and shotguns. Obama is scared sh-tless by an armed populace; if you trust him at all, you’ll wind up defending yourself against his Brown Shirts with brickbats and clothes props.


12 posted on 10/29/2008 7:17:04 PM PDT by Dionysius (Jingoism is no vice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Peter Snyder, a life-long Republican and hunter from Lake Ariel, does not believe Obama will take his hunting rifles.

No you blithering idiot, he won't take your hunting rifles, at least not at first. But he did vote to BAN the ammunition that you use in your hunting rifles, and thinks a 500% increase in the tax paid on new hunting rifles and ammunition is a good thing! And Biden is EVERY BIT AS BAD, if not worse!!!!!!

WASH OUT YOUR HEADGEAR YOU MORON! ARGHHHHHHHH!!!!!

Mark

13 posted on 10/29/2008 7:18:47 PM PDT by MarkL (Al Gore: The Greenhouse Gasbag! (heard on Bob Brinker's Money Talk))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Synder said an assault weapon ban is not a legitimate concern for hunters.

“We don’t need assault weapons to go in and shoot a deer, or there would be nothing left,”

Very convenient that they picked an imbecile to interview.

As if a .223 or 7.62x39 are going to vaporize a deer.

16 posted on 10/29/2008 7:22:19 PM PDT by holymoly ("A lot" is two words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

And yet again, no mention whatsoever of the right to self-defense, especially where it is most needed like overgrown urban gutters where Senator Government hails from.

Also no mention of his record of both opposing every tool that makes self-defense feasible, or his support for jailing any who manage to defend themselves from the thugs who make up his constituency.


17 posted on 10/29/2008 7:22:51 PM PDT by BobbyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Hey, look what I found when I got done uploading something else to TinyPic:
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

18 posted on 10/29/2008 7:27:39 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile finally updated Saturday, October 11, 2008 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Born Conservative; airborne; smoothsailing; Dr. Scarpetta; martin_fierro; Coop; Tribune7; ...
I hope folks in battleground states are asking themselves this question, and who to trust? Jive Yobama already broke his word about financing his campaign.

Life's not fair. Big city rags wouldn't do a story like this one. I don't believe that I've heard of Honesdale, PA. Maybe there's hope for journalism after all. I searched Obama gun control to find it.

23 posted on 10/29/2008 7:34:46 PM PDT by neverdem (I'm praying for a Divine Intervention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
(Obama) wrote: “While a complete ban on handguns is not politically practicable, I believe reasonable restrictions on the sale and possession of handguns are necessary to protect the public safety. In the Illinois Senate last year, I supported a package of bills to limit individual Illinoisans to purchasing one handgun a month.”

What part of "Shall Not Be Infringed" do you NOT understand you Marxist Poser?

24 posted on 10/29/2008 7:38:56 PM PDT by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

[SIGH] There are so many things wrong with that article and so much mis-information there I can’t begin to respond to it all.

In a nutshell. 0bammy will make the raping of the 2nd amendment one of the first things on his “To Do” list. He has to if he wants to implement everything else on his agenda.

I’ve said it before. He NEVER met a gun law he didn’t like and his voting record speaks for itself.


31 posted on 10/29/2008 7:52:44 PM PDT by Rebel Wolf (Not pounding my guns into plowshares)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Think AMMO

Your weapon is useless without it.


46 posted on 10/29/2008 9:38:59 PM PDT by BlessingsofLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Obama won’t immediately ban guns, but a Democrat controlled Congress will try just about everything else to enact a defacto gun ban, including licensing, registration, ammunition taxes, gun-free (no safety) zones etc.

We musn’t forget that even under current law, a gun owner takes a risk whenever he/she drives past a government school with a firearm in the car. It wouldn’t take any change in federal law for a Hussein Obama administration to set up a few BATFE check points around government schools, and start making arrests.


48 posted on 10/29/2008 10:35:49 PM PDT by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson