Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin’s Plan: Energy Independence, You Betcha
WSJ ^ | 10/29/08 | Keith Johnson enviro-patsy

Posted on 10/29/2008 12:57:41 PM PDT by pissant

Sarah Palin went to a solar plant in Ohio to talk about oil today.

he Alaska governor and Republican vice-presidential candidate reiterated that McCain-Palin administration would make “energy independence” its cornerstone with the by-now familiar mix of more domestic oil production, more nuclear power, more clean coal, and support for renewable energy. (The prepared remarks are here.)

For Gov. Palin, the centerpiece of the move toward more energy independence is more domestic oil production, Gov. Palin said, with a nod to Charles Krauthammer. But there’s more: “[W]e can drill, and refine, and mine, enrich, reprocess, invent, build, conserve, grow, and use every available means to regain our independence.”

Never mind that at a think-tank speech in Washington, former CIA director John Deutch was busy pointing out Wednesday that energy has always had a national security component and that “energy independence is not feasible” for the U.S. or its closest allies.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: energy; palin; shutuphippie
Whoever this author is, it is clear he's a tree hugging hippie who doesn't think much of Palin.
1 posted on 10/29/2008 12:57:42 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pissant

2 posted on 10/29/2008 12:58:15 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Agree this is a sneering report.

Heard the gov. this morning on Fox. She made the most sense of any politician I have heard in the last 30 years.

When is the American public going to start waking up to the greatness of America again? Ayers redefining of our school curriculum into indoctrination centers is almost complete--you can tell by the lemmings following Obama into the sea or over the cliff, or as one commentator I read today put it--while lapping up the freebies, the public will not notice the fence being built around them until it is complete and the gate is closed..

vaudine

3 posted on 10/29/2008 1:05:51 PM PDT by vaudine (RO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant
"Never mind that at a think-tank speech in Washington, former CIA director John Deutch was busy pointing out Wednesday that energy has always had a national security component and that “energy independence is not feasible” for the U.S. or its closest allies.",

Amd never mind that this former Clinton lackey who managed to get booted for taking top secret documents home on his personal computer has no energy experience and clearly was not compotent to run the CIA in the first place.

4 posted on 10/29/2008 1:08:28 PM PDT by marlon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant
former CIA director John Deutch was busy pointing out Wednesday that energy has always had a national security component and that “energy independence is not feasible” for the U.S. or its closest allies.

That is the kind of 'can't do' attitude that made the USofA the great country that it is today.

Build 1000 nuke plants, drill everywhere, allow the expansion of workable systems, and innovate the next system. Good God I am sick of the 'can't do', stupid, worthless, idiots running, or ruining, this country.

5 posted on 10/29/2008 1:09:45 PM PDT by 11Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

A former CIA director says energy independence is not feasible? Yeah, I guess I can call myself an expert. I can also declare that polio cannot be prevented, manned flight is not possible, computers will never be small enough to be portable. See, I stayed at a Holiday Inn last night, too.


6 posted on 10/29/2008 1:11:25 PM PDT by henkster (Lawyers will lead the Marxist revolution, armed with subpoenas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11Bush

Imagine the high paying jobs and economic expansion this plan would create.

That’s why they don’t like it.

They have emasculated the American Male and want to keep that up until the take over is complete.


7 posted on 10/29/2008 1:13:14 PM PDT by rlferny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: henkster

LOLOLOL!!


8 posted on 10/29/2008 1:23:46 PM PDT by gimme1ibertee (Obama: kill babies,raise taxes...Sarah: raise babies,kill taxes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pissant
the centerpiece of the move toward more energy independence

I guess the author doesn't understand the concept of improvement. We don't have to get every single drop of oil from within our borders. But we sure as heck should do better than we do today.

9 posted on 10/29/2008 1:25:49 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Perhaps we can actually harness forest biomass for energy instead of burning the West up in smoke choking fires every year. About 180,000 acres of my County burned this summer alone. Wouldn’t it be nice if that had been turned into energy rather than CO2, which exaccerbated global warming?


10 posted on 10/29/2008 1:42:07 PM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

We can get every drop of oil we need from within our borders, and for a long time to come. All we need to do is build more nuke plants, and convert our coal mining from electric generation to creating synthetic petroleum. We also dig/extract oil shale. Without fundamentally changing our energy consumption, we just change the source of the energy.

I will bow to Thackney or other experts around here, but I believe we would need a stable price around $90-$100/bbl to make it feasible, but the economy would and the end result would be worth the present costs.


11 posted on 10/29/2008 1:46:03 PM PDT by henkster (Lawyers will lead the Marxist revolution, armed with subpoenas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: henkster
we just change the source of the energy.

Step 1. Change the members of our government to elect those that support such a concept.

12 posted on 10/29/2008 1:51:33 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: henkster

The United States of America has the most innovative and creative people on the planet. With enough drive, this country can be completely energy independent, but the key to this is our willingness to do so! With energy independence, that problem in the Middle East will go away. This country can become the merchant of reusable power and receive the respect it’s due! Dependence upon foreign oil is the U.S.A.’s addiction, and it must stop!


13 posted on 10/29/2008 1:59:08 PM PDT by Ranger Warrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: thackney

“Step 1. Change the members of our government to elect those that support such a concept.”

You’ve got that right. There are only 536 people preventing us from energy independence. A small number in a nation of 300 million.


14 posted on 10/29/2008 2:05:52 PM PDT by henkster (Lawyers will lead the Marxist revolution, armed with subpoenas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson