Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why are white men expected to vote against change?
Creators Syndicate Inc. via SFGate ^ | 10/29/8 | Robert Scheer

Posted on 10/29/2008 8:17:20 AM PDT by SmithL

Let me now defend white males. We can't possibly be as dumb as the polls showing we are McCain's most reliable voting base would indicate. Do we white men believe for an instant that a vote for John McCain would not represent more of President Bush's failed economic policies at home and costly military adventures abroad, and if so, why are a majority of us expected to vote against the positive change that Barack Obama so clearly represents?

Most of us know how to read, and can even Google, so why would we think that GOP candidate McCain, who has supported Bush on every one of his economic initiatives, is now the anti-Bush? What exactly did McCain mean when he said, referring to his Democratic opponent during a campaign speech in Ohio on Monday, "We both disagree with President Bush on economic policy?"

Is McCain unaware that he consistently voted for the red ink run up by the Bush administration, or was he having a senior moment when he said that same day, "We cannot spend the next four years as we spent much of the last eight: Spending ourselves into a ditch, and hoping that the consequences don't come?"

The only time McCain took issue with Bush's economic policy was in his short-lived criticism of the tax cut for the rich - a strategy he now defends. But if McCain doesn't increase taxes for someone, just how does he plan to pay for the trillions in debt racked up by the war in Iraq, which are now vastly compounded by the banking bailout? On Monday McCain gave his answer: "I will freeze government spending on all but the most important programs, like defense, veterans' care, Social Security and health care, until we scrub every single government program...

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bluestatewhine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: Zechariah_8_13

“As someone here said, “Cuba got ‘CHANGE’ in 1959.”

Yes, that’s a great line.


41 posted on 10/29/2008 12:44:34 PM PDT by jim35 (A racist is someone who is winning an argument with a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jim35
Just curious, are you in a swing state?

No!!! I live in a blue state.

42 posted on 10/29/2008 2:19:15 PM PDT by NRG1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Gilligan, at least, was AMERICAN...

THIS Scheer Piece of sh*t is something else.


43 posted on 10/29/2008 4:50:50 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By any means necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson