Not everyone is reading it carefully. She’s not saying she regrets universal abortion on demand. She’s just saying that it might have been done more effectively by a more gradualist approach.
The problem with Roe v. Wade is not that it killed 50 million babies. The problem is that it energized the Right to Life movement.
What IS interesting is that she is as good as admitting what Democrats NEVER admit—that a majority of Americans are against abortion, even after SCOTUS laid down the law and thought that the issue had been settled.
Being pro-life is a winner at the polls. Palin doesn’t have to hide her views; Obama has to hide his.
Right on Cicero. You and I are on the same page. She did not move right. She is criticizing the left for moving too fast and causing a reaction from the right.
Ginsburg would be happy with 15 ro 25 million dead babies, as long as the right wasn’t energized to resistance.
To those that think she has moved right or putting in her bid for heaven, read the article again, and slowly.