Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Proudcongal
You say your friend wants proof that McCain didn’t pressure the media ... you can’t prove a negative.

Huh?

Sure you can. Maybe in this case it would be difficult, but "you can't prove a negative" is not a true generalization.

Suppose someone said, "Prove that Barack Obama has NOT stayed in Illinois his entire life." Could you prove it? Of course...just show a single example where he is outside Illinois.

27 posted on 10/28/2008 3:39:24 PM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Gondring
Huh?

Sure you can. Maybe in this case it would be difficult, but "you can't prove a negative" is not a true generalization.

Suppose someone said, "Prove that Barack Obama has NOT stayed in Illinois his entire life." Could you prove it? Of course...just show a single example where he is outside Illinois.

No, you can't possibly prove that McCain hasn't pressured the media. How would you possibly do that? By contacting and getting statements from every news organization that reported the story? Your example is not a negative because, just as you have pointed out, it would obviously be very easy to prove Obama had "stayed" outside of Illinois. Now, if the original poster said to his liberal friend, "prove that McCain pressured the media," that is provable if the evidence is there.

In other words, you can't present evidence to prove something that never happened.

28 posted on 10/28/2008 4:00:56 PM PDT by Proudcongal (POW/WOW '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson