DID SOMEONE TELL JUDGE R. BARCLAY SURRICK WHAT HIS RULING WOULD BE?

Gabrielle Cusumano/Townhall ^ | October 28,2008 | the wide awakes.org via Gabrielle Cusumano

[WmShirerAdmirer]

Highlights:

The original faxed decision from the Clerk of the US District Court for the Eastern District of PA to attorney Philip J Berg appears to have been faxed to Judge Surrick for him to sign. But if this is the case, the questions becomes who wrote the decision and faxed it for the Judges signature?

Barack and Michelle worked at Sidley Austin law when they met.

Also working with Michelle at Sidley at the same time was one Bernardine Dohrn, beloved wife of Bill Ayers.

Now it turns out a fellow named Christopher B. Seaman is the former law clerk for U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick.

Christopher B. Seaman also works for a firm named Sidley Austin.

10/26/2008

Judge Surrick’s ruling was faxed to him?

From: http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2008/10/26/judge-surricks-ruling-was-faxed-to-him/

Phil Berg is going to have some very interesting challenges ahead when he exposes the chain of events regarding this ruling. The ruling itself appears as though it should be thrown out; it isn’t even file or date stamped.

First, there’s - CONFLICT OF INTEREST.; Obama’s Birth Certificate Judge-Obama Linkage

Barack and Michelle worked at Sidley Austin law when they met.

Also working with Michelle at Sidley at the same time was one Bernardine Dohrn, beloved wife of Bill Ayers.

Now it turns out a fellow named Christopher B. Seaman is the former law clerk for U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick.

Christopher B. Seaman also works for a firm named Sidley Austin.

Gosh. It’s a small world after all.

Then, there’s this:

The original faxed decision from the Clerk of the US District Court for the Eastern District of PA to attorney Philip J Berg appears to have been faxed to Judge Surrick for him to sign. But if this is the case, the questions becomes who wrote the decision and faxed it for the Judges signature?

DID SOMEONE TELL JUDGE R. BARCLAY SURRICK WHAT HIS RULING WOULD BE?

(click on image for larger picture of the document)

And this:

1. The “mystery Fax (header on the bottom of the 36 pages) began at 4:55PM and ended at 5:11PM for a total of 16 minutes. But where was the “mystery fax” machine located?

2. The fax from Judge Surricks office to Phillip Berg started at 18:09 or (6:09PM) and ended at 18:16 or (6:16PM) for a total of 7 minutes. Now what would cause a whole 9 minute discrepancy in the transmission times of a fax on the exact same number of pages? And even a slower machine would not cause a difference of more than double the time of transmission for the same number of pages.

3. The ORDER has no file/date stamp on the document at any page whatsoever which is required and is standard Court procedure. Why?

Judge R. Barclay Surrick, whether intentional or not, has created a situation that challenges the very integrity of the US District Court for the Eastern District of PA as well as the integrity of the Judge himself.

All of these issues must be address without delay, and the owner and location of the “mystery Fax” must be disclosed immediately with explanation as to why a ruling said to be issued by Judge Surrick, was in reality Faxed to Judge Surrick? The first and only Fax header that should be on the ruling when faxed to Attorney Philip J Berg should have been none other than that of Judge Surrick alone.

Very, very sloppy!!!

10/26/2008 Judge Surrick’s ruling was faxed to him?

From: http://thewideawakes.org/archives/2008/10/26/judge-surricks-ruling-was-faxed-to-him/

Someone at the Philadelphia Court is looking for information on Surrick's Decision: See Sitemeter Snapshot below.

Gabrielle Cusumano By Details > Visit Detail Visit 48,561 [<<] [>>]

Domain Name uscourts.gov ? (U.S. Government) IP Address 208.27.111.# (US COURTS)

ISP Sprint Location Continent : North America Country : United States (Facts)

State : Pennsylvania

City : Philadelphia

Lat/Long : 39.9968, -75.1485 (Map)

Language English (U.S.) en-us Operating System Microsoft WinXP Browser Internet Explorer 7.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Javascript version 1.3 Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768 Color Depth : 32 bits

Time of Visit Oct 28 2008 11:07:28 am Last Page View Oct 28 2008 11:07:28 am Visit Length 0 seconds Page Views 1 Referring URL http://www.wikio.com...news/Barclay Surrick

Visit Entry Page http://gabriellecusu..._supreme_court.thtml Visit Exit Page http://gabriellecusu..._supreme_court.thtml Out Click Time Zone UTC-4:00 Visitor's Time Oct 28 2008 12:07:28 pm Visit Number 48,561

[OrioleFan]

This is why lawyers should be banned from running for office. Obama is a shyster Chicago lawyer. Biden was a lawyer for 4 years until he was elected to the Senate.

For real change we need a maverick pilot and a maverick housewife with a legacy implementing change for Joe average American.