Posted on 10/28/2008 6:28:14 AM PDT by indianyogi
And I really want to emphasize the word responsibility. I think that whether you are a white executive living out in suburbs who doesn’t want to pay taxes to inner city children for them to go to school.
Certain portions of the African American community are doing as bad if not worse and recognizing that my fate remains tied up with their fates that my individual salvation is not going to come about without a collective salvation for the country.
Unfortunately, I think that recognition requires we make sacrifices and this country is not always been willing to make the sacrifices necessary to bring about a new day and a new age.
There is a certain race weariness that confronts the country precisely because the questions are so deeply embedded and the solutions are going to require so much investment of time energy and money.
Collectivism = Socialism
do we send this to drudge too?
Let’s be clear, Obamarx wants to “TAKE FROM THE WHITES TO GIVE TO THE BLACKS”....redistribution of wealth for reparations.
ping
That would also explain the current housing situation, IMHO
Sorry about the echo
This passage makes it pretty clear how B. Hussein thinks taxation is meant to work!
Reparations?Someone needs to inform obama and his libtard supporters that we have been paying reparations to the tune of trillions of dollars over the last 40+ years.Welfare,food stamps,subsidized housing,affirmative action,etc,etc....Don’t want to sound racist,but i ran out of sympathy for minorities long ago.God help us if this man becomes our next president.
Please do, and send it to elrushbo@eib.net and Hannity@foxnews.com this is about reparations and not just redistribution of wealth.
How true. I'm waiting for someone to bring up his answer to Charlie Gibson when he said that raising capital gains taxes was the "fair" thing to do in lieu of higher revenues to the wealth spreaders.
IIRC, it was in one of the debates.
The religious language is straight out of Liberation Theology. You can’t talk about salvation apart from social change: from collectivist action to benefit all.
BINGO! That's what I was thinking after I listened to the 2001 radio interview about "redistribution of wealth" as a civil rights issue--as "reparative change," aka REPARATIONS! If this message can get around over the next week, Barry loses.
Obamanomics: That'll leave some Marx.
Yes, yes, yes! Note how in the 2001 interview, Barry ties redistribution to the civil rights movement, and note the caller's question about "reparative change."
People are finally concluding the same.
Interesting. My thanks to whomever found this one. It’s a shame the media don’t have enough real journalists to look into Obama’s background before the election. They would have been able to find this a year ago if they hadn’t been too busy. At least they have enough to investigate and critique Piper, Bristol, and Trig ... for now ... until their advertisers notice yet another drop in trust and readers/viewers and they even have to lay off part of their crack team of investigative journalists assigned to Alaska to look into Sarah’s shopping habits.
Obamarx is a white hating anti-American marxist.
OBAMA: But the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society. . . . One of the I think tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change and in some ways we still suffer from that. . . .
MODERATOR: Let’s talk with Karen. Good morning, Karen, you’re on Chicago Public Radio.
KAREN: Hi. The gentleman made the point that the Warren Court wasn’t terribly radical with economic changes. My question is, is it too late for that kind of reparative work economically and is that that the appropriate place for reparative economic work to take place – the court – or would it be legislation at this point?
OBAMA: Maybe I’m showing my bias here as a legislator as well as a law professor, but I’m not optimistic about bringing about major redistributive change through the courts. . . .
- - - - -
Obamanomics: That'll leave some Marx.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.