Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/27/2008 9:00:14 AM PDT by Brookhaven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Brookhaven

Did Rove ask the question, or is that YOU asking?


2 posted on 10/27/2008 9:01:06 AM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven

I believe that 10% to 12% undecided block in most polls is going to be what is the shcocker in this election. How many are not undecided but don’t want to say who they are voting for? How many, when they get in the privacy of the booth, with go for decades of experience over American Idol. I think all the American Idol voters have been counted in the polls.


3 posted on 10/27/2008 9:01:59 AM PDT by mnehring (We Are Joe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven

“undecided” = “doesn’t want anyone to know they will vote against the black guy”


5 posted on 10/27/2008 9:02:13 AM PDT by MrB (0bama supporters: What's the attraction? The Marxism or the Infanticide?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven

Not sure, Forrest.


6 posted on 10/27/2008 9:02:32 AM PDT by shaft29 (Just your typical black woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven

According to Michael Barone, 80% of undecideds went for Hillary during the primaries.


7 posted on 10/27/2008 9:02:38 AM PDT by Ol' Sparky (Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven

I’ve been saying that for weeks. (But I’m not Karl...lol)

Any state where Zero has less than 50%, he will lose.

Many of the polls that have him over 50% are weighted with a ridiculous number of Dems vs past election history.

This includes some of the national polls.

I think the national polls right now are about like this:

Obama: 48

McCain: 44


8 posted on 10/27/2008 9:02:50 AM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (You MUST see this website: http://www.neverfindout.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven
It's important for him to be over 50%. In those states where he is under 50% he will be in trouble.

If Obama gets 48 or 49% of the vote he will win.

9 posted on 10/27/2008 9:03:29 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (Reagan is back, and this time he's a woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven
I looked at the polls from 2004 and at this time in October there were 1%-3% undecideds. This year there are 10%-15% undecideds. Obama has had 20 months to close the deal and he has not be able to do it.

I suspect that most of the 10%-15% undecideds are decided and will go with McCain/Palin. If so, Obama is toast...

10 posted on 10/27/2008 9:03:36 AM PDT by avacado (Barack Obama, the Cloward-Piven candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven
In the primaries, Obama never received a higher number than he polled and usually got 1 - 2% less than he polled.

That's one of the reasons that the polling data is suspect.

11 posted on 10/27/2008 9:03:37 AM PDT by TexasNative2000 (Obama? No thanks. I already have a Messiah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven

People know McCain, not Obama.

Obama’s campaign theme of “change” from the current administration would make a lot more sense if the current administration was up for re-election. I don’t believe that Obama has been able to effectively tie McCain to the current administration.

That McCain has butted heads with Bush over the last 7 years and is not seen as a doctrinaire conservative Republican is a very good thing when it comes to winning over the independents and disaffected Democrats.


17 posted on 10/27/2008 9:09:50 AM PDT by Harry Wurzbach (Joe The Plumber & Rep. Thaddeus McCotter are my heroes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven
The reasoning is that a long dominant candidate like Obama becomes a quasi-incumbent, and the rule of thumb is that undecideds break against the incumbent. Recent polling shows that McCain seems to be closing the gap, his campaign message is better focused on the traditional Republican issues ot taxes and spending, and Obama’s “spread the wealth” views are getting some play via the Internet, talk radio, and Fox News.
18 posted on 10/27/2008 9:15:04 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven

Anecdotal evidence suggests that it’s quite possible. The “undecided” block has, in some previous elections, broken overwhelmingly toward one candidate, typically the one that is either underfunded or at a disadvantage in media perception (or both), as the “favorite” candidate fails to “seal the deal” prior to election day.

However, there’s no guarantee that that will happen in any given election; it’s just interesting to note that such a thing has happened before.


21 posted on 10/27/2008 9:16:15 AM PDT by kevkrom (If Obama promises to tax your neighbor to give to you, what's he promising your neighbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven

That’s the way it happened in the primaries. If polling showed O-48% and H-46% the final would be O-48% and H-52%. She’d pick up all the so-called undecideds.


23 posted on 10/27/2008 9:20:58 AM PDT by pgkdan ("White folks greed runs a world in need," Jeremiah Wright as quoted by Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven
Photobucket
25 posted on 10/27/2008 9:21:52 AM PDT by johnny7 ("Duck I says... ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven
Whatever Sen. Obama is polling on election day is the percentage of votes he will receive. That's what happened in the primaries. It's important for him to be over 50%. In those states where he is under 50% he will be in trouble.

I have heard Dick Morris (ok, ok, I know...) explain this dynamic as well. When Morris was working for Clinton on his re-election for governor in Arkansas, he got polling data two days before the election that Clinton has slipped below 50%. It was the middle of the night. He got over to the governors mansion, dragged Clinton out of bed and the two went over to the recording studio and cut ads in the middle of the night to address the issue. The ads worked and Slick was reelected.

The 12% undecided number is huge. If Obama goes into the election with it, he loses.

28 posted on 10/27/2008 9:25:28 AM PDT by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven

I share this view, the majority of people that are undecided at this point are people that have not been able to be persuaded to convince themselves to vote for Obama.

In the end they will vote for the ticket that is more comfortable and traditional. Undecideds at this stage of the election are not daring, let’s go for it and see whats on the other side!, type of people.


46 posted on 10/27/2008 9:55:52 AM PDT by ansel12 ( When a conservative pundit mocks Wasilla, he's mocking conservatism as it's actually lived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven

I have a feeling Rove is right and think that perhaps the undecided’s are not really that way but would rather not tell the pollsters what they really think for fear of being called racist or worse having the Secret Service called on them like the one person did!


55 posted on 10/27/2008 10:52:56 AM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson