Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Surrick has some ’splainin’ to do…
Cao ^ | 10/26/08 | Cao

Posted on 10/26/2008 3:32:10 PM PDT by pissant

Phil Berg is going to have some very interesting challenges ahead when he exposes the chain of events regarding this ruling. The ruling itself appears as though it should be thrown out; it isn’t even file or date stamped. First, there’s - CONFLICT OF INTEREST.; Obama’s Birth Certificate Judge-Obama Linkage:

Barack and Michelle worked at Sidley Austin law when they met.

Also working with Michelle at Sidley at the same time was one Bernardine Dohrn, beloved wife of Bill Ayers.

Now it turns out a fellow named Christopher B. Seaman is the former law clerk for U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick.

Christopher B. Seaman also works for a firm named Sidley Austin.

Gosh. It’s a small world after all.

The original faxed decision from the Clerk of the US District Court for the Eastern District of PA to attorney Philip J Berg appears to have been faxed to Judge Surrick for him to sign. But if this is the case, the questions becomes who wrote the decision and faxed it for the Judges signature?

(go to link to see fraudulent document)

DID SOMEONE TELL JUDGE R. BARCLAY SURRICK WHAT HIS RULING WOULD BE?

(Excerpt) Read more at caosblog.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: bloggersandpersonal; certifigate; larrysinclairslover; obama; philipberg; surrick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: Hemorrhage

Getting judges involved is a last ditch ploy used by Gore in 2000 ... and we TORE HIM APART for it.

TRUE ;;;;;; BUT BUT BUT

There is No ONE that has the responsibility to verify that Obama is qualified to run as President of the United States. Specifically, is he a natural born citizen? In most cases that’s easily answered but Obama will NOT supply simple documents which would prove he is qualified, instead he keeps avoiding answering a very simple question.

I agree with Phil Berg that the question needs to be answered.


41 posted on 10/26/2008 5:20:38 PM PDT by BILL_C (Those who don't understand the lessons of history are bound to repeat them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Hemorrhage

Random rumors?

Barack hasn’t produced a viable birth certificate, as of 7:21 pm AUSTIN time.

Why is he dragging this through the courts? Hmm?


42 posted on 10/26/2008 5:24:15 PM PDT by txhurl (holy cow - WE ARE OUT OF TIME - Sarah just got my EV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Hemorrhage
When I candidate for President refuses to prove that he's even a citizen of this country, someone needs force the issue period. Don't you find it just a bit odd that Obama has refused to produce a valid certificate of birth to date? The one provided on his Web site has been conclusively proven to be doctored electronically. Shouldn't that raise just a few red flags???

And as far as the FAX transmission delay, yes it is meaningless that one took much longer than the other. Endless variables can cause that from a poor phone line to a crappy fax machine on either end, or even a feeder paper jam.

43 posted on 10/26/2008 5:25:35 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: pissant
If you read the decision, a moron wrote it.

A lot of federal judges resemble that remark.

44 posted on 10/26/2008 5:29:40 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Hemorrhage; pissant
Nonetheless, it is customary for a lower-court judge to simply sign decisions presented by the winning side.

That is a lie. While the winning side often presents an order based on the reasoning, the judges tells the party his reason for his decision. If Surrick didn't write it, he violated numerous provisions of the code of judicial condut and probably obstruction of justice. If he had extra judicial contact with a party, he must recuse himself from the case.

45 posted on 10/26/2008 5:33:31 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BILL_C

We can trust the democrats to have thoroughly vetted him can’t we? After all they wouldn’t lie...would they?

LOL


46 posted on 10/26/2008 5:35:23 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Paying taxes for bank bailouts is apparently the patriotic thing to do. [/sarc])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: IrishBlue06

IrishBlue06
Since Sep 2, 2008

Obama Troll


47 posted on 10/26/2008 5:36:30 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan
To all

What now makes he whole Berg thing somewhat suspect is the result. If this was a “Hillary Plan” it seems it would have been put in front of a more “reliable” judge.
You don't do something like this unless you already know what the outcome will be.
This was likely a trap for McCain,draw him into saying something publicly about Obama’s citizenship status then “BANG” Obama whips out a BC and McCain looks foolish. Obama seals the deal !

48 posted on 10/26/2008 5:39:00 PM PDT by Reily ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Is Berg taking this to the Supreme Court now?


49 posted on 10/26/2008 5:39:56 PM PDT by Godsgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

ack! Nobama notroll. :D and you know it.


50 posted on 10/26/2008 5:49:10 PM PDT by IrishBlue06 (Cuba had "change" in 1959)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

I’d laugh and assume you must be silly, except that is such a grave insult, you must be stupid instead.


51 posted on 10/26/2008 5:50:17 PM PDT by IrishBlue06 (Cuba had "change" in 1959)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

“Obama troll”

Oh wait, sorry. You’re from Washington state, you must be talking about yourself!


52 posted on 10/26/2008 5:51:28 PM PDT by IrishBlue06 (Cuba had "change" in 1959)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: IrishBlue06

Did you notice you’re not even two months old?


53 posted on 10/26/2008 6:07:21 PM PDT by txhurl (holy cow - WE ARE OUT OF TIME - Sarah just got my EV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Terrific research and great catch !

BTTT

54 posted on 10/26/2008 6:32:47 PM PDT by pyx (Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Larry Sinclair is where the GOP should put their spotlight. We only have one week. They should give him cash to follow obambi around.

Obambi is a closet homo, and America needs to know.


55 posted on 10/26/2008 6:37:42 PM PDT by TomasUSMC ( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

He’s a closet homosexual crack whore.


56 posted on 10/26/2008 7:04:37 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: pissant
>>>He’s a closet homosexual crack whore.

Wrong! He is a Long Legged Mack Daddy

:))

57 posted on 10/26/2008 7:10:21 PM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: txflake

Nonsense, I’m 52.


58 posted on 10/26/2008 7:20:15 PM PDT by IrishBlue06 (Cuba had "change" in 1959)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: txflake; SeaHawkFan

Seahawkfan has been here just a few more months. So what? You think everyone who has a new date is a newbie? You are naive, but more than that, SO WHAT??? To even say that I could be an Obama troll is ludicrous.


59 posted on 10/26/2008 7:23:50 PM PDT by IrishBlue06 (Cuba had "change" in 1959)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: IrishBlue06

Most two-month olders don’t go on attack like you do.


60 posted on 10/26/2008 7:26:55 PM PDT by txhurl (holy cow - WE ARE OUT OF TIME - Sarah just got my EV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson