Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservative Civil War well underway
American Thinker ^ | 10/26/2008 | Rick Moran

Posted on 10/26/2008 1:00:47 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan

We at American Thinker have covered the first shots in the conflict between traditional conservatives and what many are referring to as conservative "elites." Just this week, we've featured several excellent articles on our front page including "Betting Against the Elites on Sarah Palin by J. Robert Smith and "Noonan's Slipped a Peg" by Jan LaRue.

We will continue to follow this ideological struggle closely because we believe it to be the most important story of this young century.

Who is a conservative? Who gets to decide that question? Has conservatism "failed?"

These and other questions will no doubt roil conservative media outlets, think tanks, and conferences for the next several years. I hasten to add that this is a healthy thing for the right - as long as the debates stay away from the personal and concentrate on issues and tactics.

But perhaps, that's too much to ask. Already, as we have seen, there are some influential conservatives who believe that some of the "elites" in Washington and New York have failed to help the movement by their tepid support of McCain and, most importantly, how they view the personality, the politics, and the future of McCain's running mate Sarah Palin.

As this interesting perspective penned by Tim Shippman of the UK Telegraph shows, the fault line in the conservative schism is most evident between those who love Palin and those who don't:

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; conservatism; elitism; mccainpalin; traditionalism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: snarkytart

Romney’s RINObots have declared war on Palin and the GOP.

THROW THEM OUT.


21 posted on 10/26/2008 1:28:47 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

There are conservatives and then there are go along to get along Republicans. It was the state the Republican party was in during the 60’s until Ronald Reagan came along and got the conservative movement fired up.


22 posted on 10/26/2008 1:29:44 PM PDT by yazoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard

Looking at the ‘conservatives’ who have jumped ship, there are a very large percentage of pro-abortion people.


23 posted on 10/26/2008 1:31:41 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (White Trash for Sarah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

The war is ^ON^ but it is between liberals, who want to undermine everything this country stands for and those that are trying to stop them from doing it.


24 posted on 10/26/2008 1:32:25 PM PDT by Lady GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
I think a better term is “conservative” snobs.

Delusional--insane--be better terms
25 posted on 10/26/2008 1:34:39 PM PDT by uncbob (es wouold realize that but iguess their arrogance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
The Republican party that used to win elections in congress as well as for the Presidency consisted of old money country club republicans, culture conservatives and libertarians who wanted their votes to mean something. These three groups had little use for each other but had enough similarity of interest to work together to win the elections. The culture conservatives and the libertarians have split and now the country club members see little in common with the culture conservatives.

Common purpose will let us win again. Low taxes and avoidance of foreign messes, personal freedom with personal responsibility and an optimism that contains both a forward looking outlook as well as a respect for tradition are three elements we can all agree on, IMHO

26 posted on 10/26/2008 1:36:41 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

There are Conservatives and RINO’s there is no other groups.


27 posted on 10/26/2008 1:37:50 PM PDT by stockpirate (We have all become slaves to the collective, vote McCain/Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

There are Conservatives and RINO’s there is no other groups.


28 posted on 10/26/2008 1:37:53 PM PDT by stockpirate (We have all become slaves to the collective, vote McCain/Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

You are correct.


29 posted on 10/26/2008 1:37:54 PM PDT by Comparative Advantage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

“Conservative” means just that. More accepting of the status quo, and preferring gradual change to rapid change in any direction. Most people are conservative for most things in our lives.

That is, we see no great need to overthrow the public sewer system or prohibit the use of pimento in tuna salad. Certainly no need for government to intervene to protect our sandwiches from pimento.

Of course, there are innumerable things we don’t like and would like to see changed. But no reason to “burn down the house because you don’t like the wallpaper.”

Conservatives can also accept the notion that, even if they don’t like something, often it is “Not My Problem” or even more, “Not My Business”. I may not like sweaters on dachshunds, but that is not my dachshund, so I will butt out.

Conservatives also retain the right to choose the best from a group of alternatives. If the old fangled version worked, and the new fangled version doesn’t, it is entirely acceptable to do things the old way.

But this is a bone of contention between conservatives and non-conservatives. Non-conservatives often want change for the sake of change, and to experiment with other peoples’ lives. They are not contented with the status quo, and see some terrible wrong in society that must be changed immediately.

Sometimes they are right, but often they are “crying wolf”, and while the status quo isn’t necessarily good, change would likely be no better.


30 posted on 10/26/2008 1:39:11 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Has I missed sumpin’? I wuz waitin’ to fight till after Bammy was vanquished.


31 posted on 10/26/2008 1:39:11 PM PDT by dforest (Is there any good idea out there that Obama doesn't lay claim to anymore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard

A Republican who endorses a socialist for president ain’t much of a republican.


32 posted on 10/26/2008 1:41:05 PM PDT by Buckhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
This story, like most confuses Conservatives with republicans.
33 posted on 10/26/2008 1:44:38 PM PDT by org.whodat ( "the Whipped Dog Party" , what was formally the republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
The Republican party that used to win elections in congress as well as for the Presidency consisted of old money country club republicans, culture conservatives and libertarians who wanted their votes to mean something. These three groups had little use for each other but had enough similarity of interest to work together to win the elections. The culture conservatives and the libertarians have split and now the country club members see little in common with the culture conservatives.

Most of those who jumped ship to Obama fall in that "country club" category.

And there is that split between libertarians and social conservatives.

But rank and file support for libertarian ideas ebbs and flows. Or it follows a cycle from a low point, like 1936 or 1964 to a high point like 1984.

When people feel the shoe of government regulation and taxation pinch, they get together to fix things (so long as they believe that that degree of regulation or taxation isn't necessary). When the shoe doesn't pinch, people stop caring about big government. Committed libertarians and small government devotees aren't a large part of the population.

34 posted on 10/26/2008 1:52:49 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

The young men and women crashed all around me here at the Atlanta Airport USO would likely agree with you.

Colonel, USAFR


35 posted on 10/26/2008 1:53:17 PM PDT by jagusafr ("Bugs, Mr. Rico! Zillions of 'em!" - Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
... Palin is not likely to roll over and let herself be scapegoated if things don't go well on Nov. 4 ...

And a scapegoat she will be. Many of the elitist "Republicans" out there will probably be hateful and stupid enough to accuse Governor Palin of singlehandedly destroying the Republican Party in less than 4 months.

36 posted on 10/26/2008 2:09:27 PM PDT by LiberConservative ("Typical" white guy voting for Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: x
And there is that split between libertarians and social conservatives.

Which I think is mostly the fault of social conservatives. True libertarians at least respect the pro-life view and are willing to tag along to a point. And with regard to gay marriage, no true libertarian would want to expand the role of government, add to the burden of clogged divorce courts, give new Social Security transfer privilages etc.

OTOH, regulating on-line gambling, banning the sale of horse meat etc., regulating campaign speech etc. will drive any sensible libertarian away.

37 posted on 10/26/2008 2:17:22 PM PDT by Tribune7 (Obama wants to put the same crowd that ran Fannie Mae in charge of health care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
From The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48 :

  Hysteria \Hys*te"ri*a\, n. [NL.: cf. F. hyst['e]rie. See
     Hysteric.] (Med.)
     A nervous affection, occurring almost exclusively in women,
     in which the emotional and reflex excitability is
     exaggerated, and the will power correspondingly diminished,
     so that the patient loses control over the emotions, becomes
     the victim of imaginary sensations, and often falls into
     paroxism or fits.
     [1913 Webster]
  
     Note: The chief symptoms are convulsive, tossing movements of
           the limbs and head, uncontrollable crying and laughing,
           and a choking sensation as if a ball were lodged in the
           throat. The affection presents the most varied
           symptoms, often simulating those of the gravest
           diseases, but generally curable by mental treatment
           alone. Hysteric


38 posted on 10/26/2008 2:41:29 PM PDT by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

It’s not a conservative civil war at all. We conservatives are fine with one another. We’re just not fine with the RINOs such as noonan and her brethren. So, it’s not a conservative civil war, instead it’s a war of conservatives against the moderates over who will control the Republican Party.

And just so we all know who’s winning this fight, just look at who noonan and her ilk have chosen to support. It ain’t the Republican Party. So in other words, by default, they have already lost the battle for who controls the Republican Party, because noonan and her kind have already surrendered in the battle.


39 posted on 10/26/2008 2:47:33 PM PDT by Vision Thing (obambi vs. McZilla)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision Thing

Very insightful, and dead on.


40 posted on 10/26/2008 3:29:58 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed the Republicans with stupid political enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson