[Jeff Head]

That is of course the truth...and my sites reflect that and have been doiung so for well over 10 years.

But in this particular cycle, with respects to Obama specifically in this election, we have to work hard right through election day to defeat him this time.

[Ohioan]

I think that the best way to get people thinking is to try to focus attention on the fact that Obama has people shouting in unison, al a a Nazi rally of the 1930s about "Change," but has not really deigned to tell us whether his idea of "Change" is confined to the specific programs he has advocated--although even there, poorly defined--or something more in line with the changes, advocated by some of his close associates, such as Ayers, and others in Acorn.

Even the worst "Liberals," as opposed to out and out Marxist Revolutionaries, really do not want to buy a "pig in a poke."

It has to be done with finesse, so as not to trigger the conditioned reflexes, but questions have to be asked.

I know it sounds unfair to many, but we need to find a way to get people to understand that it is not an accident, that something so carefully choreographed as a Presidential acceptance speech, was not accidentally moved to a great stadium from a Convention Hall. The need for Totalitarian movements to show massed support is a very significant aspect of their collective mindsets--I actually used the phenomenon as a major factor in the denouement of my political novel, Return Of The Gods. To the Socialist Totalitarian, numbers are everything. Neither the stadium nor the chanting in unison were accidental.

The other side of all of this is, of course, incredibly grim. Our politics have degenerated into the exact opposite of what the calm, deliberating, Patriots, hoped to establish.