[Senator Goldwater]

Surrick is a Clinton judge.

Which speaks for itself.

[Travis McGee]

What if Barack Odingo is elected POTUS, and later it’s proven beyond any doubt that he was born in Kenya, and is a fraudulent president according to the Constitution?

[Hegemony Cricket]

the fix is in

[ozzymandus]

RAT judge. be prepared for a lot more of this.

[pray4liberty]

When you have a Judge taking orders from the Obama campaign, justice has already been subverted.

This should be investigated and this lazy judge impeached for not doing his job!

[machogirl]

I would be interested to hear what Berg has to say on this.

[Canedawg]

This fax thing is suspicious, particularly in the context of the written decision allegedly containing language dismissing the plaintiff’s claims as “ridiculous, untrue, frivolous, etc.”

In an earlier thread I described these characterizations as beyond the purview of a proper decision on a motion to dismiss, and was clearly overkill by a verbose judge, for whom 34 pages of diatribe seemed appropriate.

Perhaps the decision was written by a partisan hack.

[dep]

not to diminish the allegations suggested here, but it is commonplace for a judge’s law clerk to write the judge’s decisions. which is what probably happened here. that will certainly be the excuse offered, in any event.

[IllumiNaughtyByNature]

ping

[HANG THE EXPENSE]

I’m sure the clintons are aware of this.Time for drudge to look at this.

[NOBAMA in 08]

THIS REALLY STINKS!!!
BUT ITS NOTHING COMPRED TO WHAT WILL HAPPEN
IF THAT RAT GETS THE POTUS!!
ALL JUSTICE WILL END!!
HUGO CHAVEZ WILL LOOK LIKE A SAINT!
NOBAMA IN 08!! NOBAMAS EVER FOR AMERICA!!!

[KJC1]

Just for info:

Judge’s orders are often written by the attorney(s) for the party wishing the order to be made, then the judge signs it.

Or, the judge can order one party to write up the order as he/she (the judge) instructed him/her to do, and if the order complies with the judge’s request, it is then signed by the judge.

[expatpat]

The explanation may be quite different.

The decision came out on a Saturday, with the Judge's secretary probably not at work. She may have finished it at home and faxed it from her home to the Judge.

[Calpernia]

>>>Is it possible that a former law clerk of Judge Surrick, Christoper B. Seaman, might have wrote the decision?

Obama worked at this firm and Andy Martin reported on it.

http://contrariancommentary.blogspot.com/2008/09/andy-martin-exposes-barack-obamas-lies.html

Excerpt:

Obama's law degree thus appears to have been financed through the encouragement of persons who had been violent revolutionaries and remain unrepentant to this day, the same unconventional way the purchase of Obama's Chicago mansion was party financed by an Iraqi billionaire.

Why did Obama get hired as a "summer associate" in 1989 at the law firm which had hired Ayers' wife, and where Ayers' father was a prominent friend of the managing partner at Sidley & Austin? The answer is obvious. Ayers was grooming Obama as his future "front."

Where did Obama get his first and only legal job after Harvard? At a law firm where Tony Rezko was a prominent client and where name partner Judson Miner was a law school classmate of Bernadine Dohrn-Ayers. Yes, the pieces are starting to come together.

Was Obama telling ABC the truth when he said met the Ayers' at a coffee klatch at the Ayers home in 1995? Ayers had already been working with Obama for seven years; Ayers had appointed Obama to head a $50 million foundation. Did Ayers appoint a stranger? Or a front man? The answer is obvious.

(snip)

http://contrariancommentary.blogspot.com/2008/09/andy-martin-hammers-barack-obama-over.html

Excerpt:

1989 Tom Ayers and William Ayers get Obama a summer job at Sidley & Austin (where he meets Michelle Obama); Ayers' wife Bernadine Dohrn also worked at Sidley at about the same time as Barack and Michelle.

[mlocher]

I can’t believe that the judge did not make some sort of up or down ruling. Most liberal judges love to make decisions from the bench.

[Danae]

Thank you VERY much for the Ping Dawg! I have been waiting for your thread!

D

[RushingWater]

I was thinking “Faxing a Fax”?? Haven’t they heard of attaching a doc to an email? BUT, email would leave a record so perhaps Faxing is a no discovery option when the sender immediately shreds the original.

Grounds for an appeal and see how this one is explained?? If they don’t do cross shredding, might be some interesting trash from the Chicago law office.

[Islander7]

Philip J. Berg is Appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court as Obama is "NOT" qualified to be President of the United States Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed from Philadelphia Federal Court

(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/25/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he is immediately appealing the dismissal of his case to the United States Supreme Court. The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.

Berg said, "I am totally disappointed by Judge Surrick's decision and, for all citizens of the United States, I am immediately appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court.

This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don't have standing, if you don't have standing, if your neighbor doesn't have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States - the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world - then who does?

So, anyone can just claim to be eligible for congress or the presidency without having their legal status, age or citizenship questioned.

According to Judge Surrick, we the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under the U.S. Constitution.

What happened to ‘...Government of the people, by the people, for the people,...’ Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address 1863.

We must legally prevent Obama, the unqualified candidate, from taking the Office of the Presidency of the United States,” Berg said.

Our website obamacrimes.com now has 71.8 + million hits. We are urging all to spread the word of our website – and forward to your local newspapers and radio and TV stations.

Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, “we” the people, are heading to a “Constitutional Crisis” if this case is not resolved forthwith.

PDF of ruling

There is no fax header at the bottom of these PDF pages. The quality is very poor though.

Berg's website

[jzlouis]

We need to flood both the media and congress. I have created a new petition to demand the media look into Obama’s eligibility for the Presidency. This petition sends letters to various media outlets. Please sign and pass it around.

http://www.rallycongress.com/gotcitizenship/1343/petition-to-demand-that-diane-feinstein-chairwoman-senate-committee-on-rules-and-administration-inve/

[PressurePoint]

From the decision:

Surrick ruled that Berg lacked standing to bring the case, saying any harm from an allegedly ineligible candidate was "too vague and its effects too attenuated to confer standing on any and all voters."

Really? So now any claim that the Constitution is being violated can be dismissed because the harm of the violation is too vague? As if just violating the Constitution is not enough. Now you have to prove to some judge that the harm hurts you enough to warrant the court enforcing the Constitution.

Lost your right to free speech? Ahh, you keeping your mouth shut doesn't seem that harmful to Judge Surrick. DISMISSED!

Gov't closed down your church and told you to worship in a mosque? Ahh, Jesus or Allah, the difference seems vague to Judge Surrick. DISMISSED!

Gov't confiscated your gun? Ahh, the likelihood that you'll need to defend yourself seems vague to Judge Surrick. Sorry, DISMISSED!

Wow, we are in for a wild ride.