Can we get a Constitutional attorney’s opinion on this ruling?
I'm not an attorney at all, but I can tell you that - contrary to the spin that the Obama campaign might put on it - the ruling did not say that Berg's claims of Obama's constitutional ineligibility for POTUS were false or disingenuous. The ruling merely dodged a detailed public examination of Obama's credentials or lack thereof, which would have occurred if the suit were allowed to proceed.
You mean like Bill Clinton's and Obama's opinion? They're Constitutional lawyers -- at least to the extent that they both are lawyers (or Clinton was, at any rate, and is now eligible to be reinstated), and both taught Constitutional law at the university level.